Speculation Musa to Fenerbahce

[SJN-Fox]

According to The Merc, negotiations have started for Ahmed Musa to move to Fenerbahce.

http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/l...n-fenerbah-e/story-30379119-detail/story.html

 

[FIF]

According to The Merc, negotiations have started for Ahmed Musa to move to Fenerbahce.

http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/l...n-fenerbah-e/story-30379119-detail/story.html

Are they allowed to discuss transfers before the 1st July?

 

[SJN-Fox]

I believe they can talk with a view to the transfer taking place on the 1st July ... Man City have done just that with their new goalie.

 

[City Fan]

If he stayed I wouldn't be too disappointed as I think there's a chance he could potentially come good over time.

But if we have an opportunity to recoup a big chunk of what we spent, we should probably do it.

 

[Skitzo]

its not a transfer window its a registration window, you can sign a player when ever you like but you cannot register them except in those windows or if he was a free agent and you have space

 

[FIF]

its not a transfer window its a registration window, you can sign a player when ever you like but you cannot register them except in those windows or if he was a free agent and you have space

So why can't Liverpool tap up Van dijk?

 

[FIF]

If we get all our money back I don't mind. However I have faith in our scouting and don't see why he won't come good.

 

[Lako42]

So why can't Liverpool tap up Van dijk?

You can't tap up anyone regardless of the time of the year

 

[FIF]

You can't tap up anyone regardless of the time of the year

but if it's only a registration window...

What's the difference between Fenerbahce contacting Musa and Liverpool contacting Van Dijk?

 

[homer]

So why can't Liverpool tap up Van dijk?

The article headlines the fact that the two Clubs are in talks about a potential move. That is perfectly legal (and normal business)

Liverpool were sitting down and discussing things with the player, without Southampton's consent

 

[SJN-Fox]

Permission from the club?

Southampton don't want to sell whereas, we were probably asked and said yes.

 

[City Fan]

What's the difference between Fenerbahce contacting Musa and Liverpool contacting Van Dijk?

One happened. The other probably hasn't.

 

[FIF]

The article headlines the fact that the two Clubs are in talks about a potential move. That is perfectly legal (and normal business)

Liverpool were sitting down and discussing things with the player, without Southampton's consent

Okay, thanks.

They didn't contact Musa, they contacted Leicester.

 

[M17TT C]

I'd take a 5er for him tbh!

 

[Mawsley]

I'm free next Thursday, I'll run him to the ferry.

 

[samfox]

It might be a loan.

 

[SJN-Fox]

Some places saying a loan whereas this website quotes a £17.4m fee

http://owngoalnigeria.com/2017/06/0...musa-agrees-17-4m-move-to-fenerbahce-reports/

I suspect this might be a bit of an own goal.

 

[FOX Franks]

If he stayed I wouldn't be too disappointed as I think there's a chance he could potentially come good over time.

But if we have an opportunity to recoup a big chunk of what we spent, we should probably do it.

Wasn't Musa 12m? If so, we've bizarrely made money from this one

 

[City Fan]

Wasn't Musa 12m? If so, we've bizarrely made money from this one

£12m? You wish.

 

[pork pie fox]

£12m? You wish.

I thought it was reported to be about £18m?