Neutrino experiment repeat at Cern finds same result

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Meanwhile, back in the real world...:icon_roll
 

It's not such a shocking revelation and it doesn't follow that warp drive and time travel are possible. Neutrinos are virtually mass-less particles, so it doesn't violate E=mc^2 by travelling at lightspeed. In terms of scale, if a hydrogen atom was the size of the Solar system, a single neutrino would be the size of a golfball. That's ****ing small.
 
"You may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist, but that's just peanuts to space"
- Douglas Adams
 
It's not such a shocking revelation and it doesn't follow that warp drive and time travel are possible. Neutrinos are virtually mass-less particles, so it doesn't violate E=mc^2 by travelling at lightspeed. In terms of scale, if a hydrogen atom was the size of the Solar system, a single neutrino would be the size of a golfball. That's ****ing small.

Crikey. It's been a long and lonely road but I think I've found someone with some perspective and understanding on the issue.

We should move out to the country together, throw away our televisions and live in glorious, glorious isolation.
 
Does this all mean the Borg are definitely coming, or what ?
 
It's not such a shocking revelation and it doesn't follow that warp drive and time travel are possible. Neutrinos are virtually mass-less particles, so it doesn't violate E=mc^2 by travelling at lightspeed. In terms of scale, if a hydrogen atom was the size of the Solar system, a single neutrino would be the size of a golfball. That's ****ing small.

virtually mass less isn't mass less :)

and relavity says anything of non zero rest mass cannot be sped up to the speed of light, so it would violate current thinking
 
In Einstein's day nothing so small had even been conceived. The equation as a general sort of model still stands up to a decent level of scrutiny.
 
and relavity says anything of non zero rest mass cannot be sped up to the speed of light, so it would violate current thinking
That's not strictly true. It's just the energy involved doing it would be prohibitive.
 
In Einstein's day nothing so small had even been conceived. The equation as a general sort of model still stands up to a decent level of scrutiny.

er? is this the same Einstein who theorised photons? the zero rest-mass tiny sub-atomic particle?
 
ok...cannot practically be sped up

:p
 
She's on her way, that's all I'm bothered about...

seven.jpg
 
virtually mass less isn't mass less :)

and relavity says anything of non zero rest mass cannot be sped up to the speed of light, so it would violate current thinking

Yes, but it wouldn't require infinite energy to get there
 
Crikey. It's been a long and lonely road but I think I've found someone with some perspective and understanding on the issue.

We should move out to the country together, throw away our televisions and live in glorious, glorious isolation.

You bring a blanket and I'll bring a box of green Rizlas
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627

Latest posts

Top