FIF
Well-Known Member
And it's on the chest, which we have got used to over the last 35 or so years. Horrific sleeve and all over the kit sponsors are for Scandinavian teams.
So conditioning.
And it's on the chest, which we have got used to over the last 35 or so years. Horrific sleeve and all over the kit sponsors are for Scandinavian teams.
Not conditioning all . The larger logo was part of the shirt in line with the black and gold design . The purple SCB logo has hastily attached and looked extremely out of place.So conditioning.
Can someone explain to me why the tiny sleeve advert is so offensive, and the great big chest advert is not?
Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk
So if it's just a case of colour, would people be happy if we had a change kit in natty Fiorentina violet to match the advertiser's logo? I don't remember people complaining about colour in the Walkers/LG/Alliance+Leicester/Tops Tiles years
Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk
You've missed the point, massively.So if it's just a case of colour, would people be happy if we had a change kit in natty Fiorentina violet to match the advertiser's logo? I don't remember people complaining about colour in the Walkers/LG/Alliance+Leicester/Tops Tiles years
Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk
I don't remember people complaining about colour in the Walkers/LG/Alliance+Leicester/Tops Tiles years
Please don't start allowing sponsors elsewhere on the shirts (or shorts, or socks), or we'll end up with something like this, or worse.
View attachment 13751
Not conditioning all . The larger logo was part of the shirt in line with the black and gold design . The purple SCB logo has hastily attached and looked extremely out of place.
I may be a slave to corporate culture, but my favourite logo was the Office Depot one we used to have.You can keep repeating yourself but its still not going to transform into a valid point. Yes i remember the crap crisp logo yes it was shite . I tbink you are attempting to indicate that i accept sponsors on the chest but not on the arms although im unsure as to why ? Im at a loss as to why you cant grasp the simple point that its the quality and haste of application that has irked some people . Exactly like when the king power letters fell of the shirt ( on the chest a few years back ) .
Good UnI may be a slave to corporate culture, but my favourite logo was the Office Depot one we used to have.
You can keep repeating yourself but its still not going to transform into a valid point. Yes i remember the crap crisp logo yes it was shite . I tbink you are attempting to indicate that i accept sponsors on the chest but not on the arms although im unsure as to why ? Im at a loss as to why you cant grasp the simple point that its the quality and haste of application that has irked some people . Exactly like when the king power letters fell of the shirt ( on the chest a few years back ) .
I believe you are missing the point also.I'll keep repeating myself, you'll keep repeating yourself, that's how conditioning works.
Fact is you've accepted chest advertising but arm advertising is new and you haven't accepted that yet.
In the NBA they are allowing chest advertising this season for the first time, fans are in uproar, I remember the same in football.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |