Porter Update

[Nottingham Fox]

Not as bad as 1st feared.

Should be back in the new year.

From OS

http://www.lcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/LatestNews/0,,10274~1157340,00.html

 

[newtonfox]

Not as bad as 1st feared.

Should be back in the new year.

From OS

http://www.lcfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/LatestNews/0,,10274~1157340,00.html

Good stuff levi was the real fire in the game ,untill they took him out :icon_evil

 

[alex]

Good stuff levi was the real fire in the game ,untill they took him out :icon_evil

He was excellent.

 

[newtonfox]

He was excellent.

The way he went around the chelski defenders was unreal we where in the bottom right cornor near their fans and too see him move on the ball like he did was class

 

[Disco Bob]

Did someone slip drugs into the London beer?

Were 6,500 people undergoing some kind of mass psychosis?

"Excellent"? "Class"? "Fire"?

This thread is about Porter isn't it?:icon_eek:

 

[newtonfox]

Did someone slip drugs into the London beer?

Were 6,500 people undergoing some kind of mass psychosis?

"Excellent"? "Class"? "Fire"?

This thread is about Porter isn't it?:icon_eek:

yep it is and yes we are talking about porter

 

[OldGit]

yep it is and yes we are talking about porter

No, Porter (Levi) not porter (beer)!

But yes, he was excellent for the short period he was on. Glad to know it's not as bad as it looked. We were at the opposite end of the shed, on the top shelf so not so close, but it looked a real sickener when it happened.

 

[fludie]

Yes he was just down below me, looked pretty bad, his chip for the goal was just class then he went off and we brought Maybury on?????

Glad it is not too serious though.

 

[Hazzman]

His ball for Campbell's goal was superb.

 

[alex]

His ball for Campbell's goal was superb.

And his run which bought a foul leading to our 3rd goal was brilliant.

 

[step]

I cant believe we are talking about the same player, It must have been good

 

[OldGit]

I cant believe we are talking about the same player, It must have been good

He was. The fact that he was hacked down three times also demonstrates it. In the short time he was on he made as many effective runs at their defence as SWP did against ours in 90 minutes.

He seems to have bulked up a bit too, and I suspect that his small size is probably less of a handicap against the more skillful defences than against the cloggers he comes up against in the league.

 

[alex]

He was. The fact that he was hacked down three times also demonstrates it. In the short time he was on he made as many effective runs at their defence as SWP did against ours in 90 minutes.

He seems to have bulked up a bit too, and I suspect that his small size is probably less of a handicap against the more skillful defences than against the cloggers he comes up against in the league.

He was like that at Palace too I thought.....

 

[Durham Fox]

Yet against Barnsley he clearly didnt fancy it

 

[Dour]

Don't think he'd have made the squad at Chelsea if he'd have said he didn't fancy coming on against Barnsley.

 

[Durham Fox]

Don't think he'd have made the squad at Chelsea if he'd have said he didn't fancy coming on against Barnsley.

I doubt he said that, it really wasn't my point.