We could do a lot worse, and we have.Surely we won't see Nalis back will we?
Assuming we will strengthen the squad in January, are there any current Plymouth Argyle players we think could do a job here?
I know so little about them actually. Ebanks-Blake gets a lot of good press mind....Surely we won't see Nalis back will we?
I am new to Talking balls and am posting for the first time. Generally hello to the world wide city community from an old city fan who remembers the golden sixties teams
TBH, if Plymouth players are the level of our ambitions when signing new players, I'd rather do without MM and IH.
TBH, if Plymouth players are the level of our ambitions when signing new players, I'd rather do without MM and IH.
I'm talking percentages, and the highest percentage of quality players that could fit into this team aren't playing at Plymouth.No harm in signing the big fish from the small pond, under O'Neill our best signings were from clubs like Plymouth. Should we not be judging each player on thier individual merit?
I'm talking percentages, and the highest percentage of quality players that could fit into this team aren't playing at Plymouth.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 23 | 56 |
2 | Arsenal | 23 | 47 |
3 | Nottm F | 24 | 47 |
4 | Manchester C | 23 | 41 |
5 | Newcastle | 24 | 41 |
6 | Chelsea | 23 | 40 |
7 | Bournemouth | 24 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 24 | 37 |
9 | Fulham | 24 | 36 |
10 | Brighton | 24 | 34 |
11 | Brentford | 23 | 31 |
12 | Manchester U | 23 | 29 |
13 | Palace | 23 | 27 |
14 | West Ham | 23 | 27 |
15 | Everton | 23 | 26 |
16 | Tottenham | 23 | 24 |
17 | Wolves | 24 | 19 |
18 | Leicester | 24 | 17 |
19 | Ipswich | 24 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 24 | 9 |