pro 40 v Kent

[MKFox]

we won the toss and are batting first

 

[MKFox]

70-3 off 13 overs

 

[MKFox]

175 all out.....:icon_conf

 

[glyn]

early wickets and we could still win this with our spinners. but if they get a decent start then we're done for.

 

[Brauny Blue]

I thought we lost the plot in the middle overs. Lack of urgency in the running between wickets at times imo.

 

[Brauny Blue]

Kent 62 for 1 after 11.5 overs.

Looking comfortable for them:icon_conf

 

[CM]

The likes of Nixon and Allenby had to be a bit cautious, there wasn't a lot from 6 down. We're playing with a batsman short.

Kent should win this as they have all rounders down to 10.

In other news I see Harmison is probably out of the India series. I think its between Broad and Tremlett to who plays. Just not Plunkett please!

 

[fox58]

lost by 6 wickets with more than 6 overs to spare and we used 7 bowlers

 

[glyn]

The likes of Nixon and Allenby had to be a bit cautious, there wasn't a lot from 6 down. We're playing with a batsman short.

Kent should win this as they have all rounders down to 10.

In other news I see Harmison is probably out of the India series. I think its between Broad and Tremlett to who plays. Just not Plunkett please!

They may go for the experience of Anderson. I can't see Plunkett coming back yet.

I agree about our line-up, but they may have been hindered by Maunders being injured. Although again what is the feckin point of Jacobs??? He didn't play in a one-dayer again!!

We played one spinner too many, especially since Snapey only bowled himself at the end. I think Henderson would be the man to drop.