Qpr (a)

[4-4-2]

Two changes...

Berner in for McGivern.
N'Guessen in for Gallagher.

Weale

Neilson Hobbs Brown Berner

Oakley King Wellens N'Guessen

Waghorn Fryatt

 

[Scarby]

come on city

 

[SJN-Fox]

Subs??

 

[pipes]

Confused about N'Guessan in for Gallagher... I thought it would have been worth keeping him in, still, after his 2 goals against Palace. But Nige knows best

 

[Profondo Rosso]

I still think we shoukd be playing Gallagher up front, but NP always says he chooses his best line-up based on the opposition, obviously he thinks we need a bit of pace for this one.

 

[DesertFox]

Subs??

No thanks, I'm driving.

 

[homer]

Two changes...

Berner in for McGivern.
N'Guessen in for Gallagher.

Weale

Neilson Hobbs Brown Berner

Oakley King Wellens N'Guessen

Waghorn Fryatt

At the risk of being overly melodramatic and ridiculously fickle....

That's a pile of shit

 

[Macky]

Two changes...

Berner in for McGivern.
N'Guessen in for Gallagher.

Weale

Neilson Hobbs Brown Berner

Oakley King Wellens N'Guessen

Waghorn Fryatt

Where have you gotten the team line up from?

 

[homer]

Where have you gotten the team line up from?

Some QPR scout stuck it on a website a couple of days ago

Don't you know anything :icon_roll

 

[Miles Away]

Surprised to see Nguessen back, as I said he had no chance earlier in the week.

Probably agree with the Berner decision for this one.

 

[Lako42]

At the risk of being overly melodramatic and ridiculously fickle....

That's a pile of shit

Tend to agree, why does NP drop his top performers?

We are going to get absolutely slaughtered down our right hand side.

 

[Micky]

Tend to agree, why does NP drop his top performers?

We are going to get absolutely slaughtered down our right hand side.

Didn't think McGivern was a top performer?

 

[Miles Away]

I worry more about the left hand side of that lineup to be honest. Either way, we're playing QPR not Inter, so fingers crossed.

 

[Lako42]

Didn't think McGivern was a top performer?

No

 

[Micky]

No

Do you mean gallagher then?

 

[homer]

Didn't think McGivern was a top performer?

Gallagher was/is

And Neilson, with no one in front of him - disaster waiting to happen

 

[Micky]

Neilson, with no one in front of him - disaster waiting to happen

I'd much sooner have oakley there than an out and out winger. We may be less incisive going forward but we will probably have better protection.

 

[TommyK]

At the risk of being overly melodramatic and ridiculously fickle....

That's a pile of shit

What would you have liked to have seen?

 

[Micky]

What would you have liked to have seen?

davids!

 

[homer]

What would you have liked to have seen?

Davids should be in, for a start

And Norris