Speculation Schlupp to Wigan on loan
- Thread starter Lboro fox
- Start date
- Status
Blaarev
Well-Known Member
They will know each other from Brentford, where Schlupp spent some time on loan when Rosler was manager there.
Miles Away
Well-Known Member
Not sure there is a good reason to do this, unless there is another signing coming in.
Possible we will keep Waghorn instead I suppose.
Possible we will keep Waghorn instead I suppose.
Arightfilbert
Active Member
You´re right. We have reached that stage of the season where injuries start to occur & if, let´s say, Wood´s injury recurs and (god forbid) Nuge gets crocked, then we haven´t got much cover up front!
I thought it was a brave decision to send Danns back to Bolton.......hopefully there was som extra financial (pre-sale) incentive involved.
Keeper-wise, it looks like being Conrad v Butland.
:
londonfox
Well-Known Member
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Why - we currently have 4 very capable central midfielders for 2 positions. It would have been stupid not to send him back.
Keeper-wise, it looks like being Conrad v Butland.
What? Why would we want Butland? Or any other keeper for that matter? Why would Butland come here to sit on the bench?
Arightfilbert
Active Member
drummindefender
Active Member
Arightfilbert
Active Member
Exactly......underlining my use of the adjective "brave," being an interpretation of the fact that NP believes that we have adequate cover in midfield:icon_wink
Blaarev
Well-Known Member
I think his post was crapGood evening Drummin! Dunno what you sent, but it just looks like a very small square on here......obviously not compatible?
Arightfilbert
Active Member
.......I´ve seen better.
Blaarev
Well-Known Member
Maybe turd is a better description
Nottingham Fox
Moderator
Wigan will make the play offs IMO. I don't think we should be loaning them anyone.
LCFC'sGodWears9
Well-Known Member
With Rosler for sure, rate him quite highly as a manager.
Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
Completely agree. Wigan could easily put a big winning run together and be tough play off opponents.
The reality is that Schlupp desperately needs regular football and he just isn't getting it with us. Somewhere like Charlton, with a clause that we can recall him, would be ideal.
Nottingham Fox
Moderator
Schlupp on his day can be a very good player. We've seen glimpses of that in the past. I'm all for players getting game time, but I don't think this is a wise move for us.
Uncle Connolly
Active Member
Agreed, it would be completely bonkers.
This is in effect one of our strikers and our back-up left back so I can't see this happening.
It's all well and good getting young players experience but at the end of the day this club finishing at least second place is far bigger than any one player.
camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
I haven't heard him moan about the size of our squad either.
In fact I am fairly confident that the tightness of our squad is a contributory factor in our current success. NP has to be very careful with who he moves in and out during this period.
To be fair though NP has managed the personnel within our 'extended ' large squad exceptionally well.
If Schlupp were to go out on loan I believe this would only be to balance out an incoming striker.
Last edited:
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Leicester | 45 | 97 |
| 2 | Ipswich | 45 | 93 |
| 3 | Leeds Utd | 45 | 90 |
| 4 | Southampton | 45 | 84 |
| 5 | Norwich City | 45 | 73 |
| 6 | West Brom | 45 | 72 |
| 7 | Hull City | 45 | 70 |
| 8 | Middlesbro | 45 | 66 |
| 9 | Coventry City | 45 | 64 |
| 10 | Preston | 45 | 63 |
| 11 | Bristol City | 45 | 62 |
| 12 | Cardiff City | 45 | 62 |
| 13 | Swansea City | 45 | 57 |
| 14 | Watford | 45 | 56 |
| 15 | Sunderland | 45 | 56 |
| 16 | Millwall | 45 | 56 |
| 17 | QPR | 45 | 53 |
| 18 | Stoke City | 45 | 53 |
| 19 | Blackburn | 45 | 50 |
| 20 | Sheffield W | 45 | 50 |
| 21 | Plymouth | 45 | 48 |
| 22 | Birmingham | 45 | 47 |
| 23 | Huddersfield | 45 | 45 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 45 | 24 |
