Show your knowledge

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's definitely longer than any other team in the top 4 divisions though. I remember the stat being batted about quite a bit earlier this season.
 
Pathetic isn't it? 50 years now apparently of never finishing in top six of a division!


Question 1: Who finished fourth in the Football League 3rd Division in 1962/63?

Question 2: Who finished top of the Football League 3rd Division in 1963/64?

Question 3: Who finished third in the Football League 2nd Division in 1965/66?

Question 4: Who finished top of the Football League 2nd Division in 1966/67?
 
Question 1: Who finished fourth in the Football League 3rd Division in 1962/63?

Question 2: Who finished top of the Football League 3rd Division in 1963/64?

Question 3: Who finished third in the Football League 2nd Division in 1965/66?

Question 4: Who finished top of the Football League 2nd Division in 1966/67?

Aberdeen? :102:
 
Question 1: Who finished fourth in the Football League 3rd Division in 1962/63?

Question 2: Who finished top of the Football League 3rd Division in 1963/64?

Question 3: Who finished third in the Football League 2nd Division in 1965/66?

Question 4: Who finished top of the Football League 2nd Division in 1966/67?

The pedantics are off again. Read something on a Chaventry forum and the mistake is jumped upon by the vultures.
 
Bocs a very clever boy, he likes people to know that too.


Boc would rather correct people when they are quoting misleading statistics rather than risk having them quote them somewhere else where it could lead to embarrassment in front of people who are not friends and have other axes to grind.

If you're going to take the piss out of somebody, it is always better to have your facts exactly right rather than run the risk of them having some comeback. Covscum's record is bad enough without exaggerating it.
 
Last edited:
Boc would rather correct people when they are quoting misleading statistics rather than risk having them quote them somewhere else where it could lead to embarrassment in front of people who are not friends and have other axes to grind.

If you're going to take the piss out of somebody, it is always better to have your facts exactly right rather than run the risk of them having some comeback. Covscum's record is bad enough without exaggerating it.

and let's face it, it's not hard to google and check your stats
 
Boc would rather correct people when they are quoting misleading statistics rather than risk having them quote them somewhere else where it could lead to embarrassment in front of people who are not friends and have other axes to grind.

If you're going to take the piss out of somebody, it is always better to have your facts exactly right rather than run the risk of them having some comeback. Covscum's record is bad enough without exaggerating it.

Saviour
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Chelsea2240
5Manchester C  2238
6Newcastle2238
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2216
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226
Back
Top