Redditch Fox
Well-Known Member
It is arguable that Di Stefano and Matthews would have been more effective today because they would have played on better pitches abd been better protected by referees. Matthews was subjected to brutal tackles that would have caused instant dismissal.
I remember Frank O'Farrell the Leicester manager before Jimmy Bloomfield saying that Davie Gibson's performance depended on the state of the pitch and he tried not to play him if the pitch was muddy. Gibson would have loved the pitch at the Walkers.
By that time Davie Gibson would have been well passed his peak of the mid-sixties (under Matt Gillies). At his very best he was an all purpose inside forward who scored goals as well as creating them.
However, the general point you make about pitches (and you could add the state of the ball due to the conditions) is very valid. When we used to arrive at the ground we would see the state of the pitch as a big issue in terms of who would and wouldn't play well.
The relatively high attendances of today - certainly in the Premiership and to an extent in the so called 'Championship' suggests that the public likes what it sees - but it's certainly a different game to years ago.
On players - Leicester has had three world class players (in their era) since the second world war: Banks, Shilton & Lineker. We have also had some very talented crowd favourites (in their era) like Gibson, McLintock, Weller and Worthington and then some 'local heroes' (not necessarily Leicester born though) like Rowley, Cross and Walsh (Steve - tho Jimmy wasn't bad either). The rest include the decent like Izzet who had a touch of class and the ok like Alan Smith/ Matt Elliott - but not that much to get too excited about.