Stoke City - Sunday 4th May 2008 - 2pm

[Melton Fox]

You got infracted for that? :icon_lol:

Yep, and I'm very sorry.

 

[Yorkshire Vixen]

ott imo!!

 

[homer]

I apologise if anybody took this as a serious "threat of violence towards another forum member".

.

I felt very intimidated by it

 

[Nottingham Fox]

What a load of bollocks.

We can moan as much as we want to, but they (Stoke) have allocated us a total of 2,000 tickets. They are not obliged to offer us anymore.

Lets hope the 2,000 that have been able to get tickets really get behind the lads and are having a party at the end of the game instead of Stoke.

 

[Bezu Fache Fox]

Just annoyed I can't go. Couldn't have applied earlier either as I didn't know where I was going to be. Hope Sky show it.

 

[Jeff]

Lets hope the 2,000 that have been able to get tickets really get behind the lads and are having a party at the end of the game instead of Stoke.

I think it would be better if both sets of fans were celebrating at the end.

 

[Durham Fox]

I'm just really releived I'm not going. Going to find something else to do during the game too.

 

[MHS]

I'm just really releived I'm not going. Going to find something else to do during the game too.

Something more fun than being at the Britannia. Like trapping various body parts in mouse traps?

 

[Nottingham Fox]

I think it would be better if both sets of fans were celebrating at the end.

Southampton to lose tonight and on Sunday and us losing on Sunday would suit me down to the ground :icon_cool

 

[Yorkshire Vixen]

Southampton to lose tonight and on Sunday and us losing on Sunday would suit me down to the ground :icon_cool

me too but how fecking negative is that?? but needs must :icon_cry:

 

[highland fox]

Southampton to lose tonight and on Sunday and us losing on Sunday would suit me down to the ground :icon_cool

Southampton just getting one point out of the six would suit me

 

[bocadillo]

You got infracted for that? :icon_lol:

Yep, and I'm very sorry.

No, he didn't - and I can't imagine why he is saying he did.

Melton is quite aware that he is only one infraction from a ban after his last round of nonsense. If he had been infracted today, he would now be banned - which he isn't.

 

[bocadillo]

We can moan as much as we want to, but they (Stoke) have allocated us a total of 2,000 tickets. They are not obliged to offer us anymore.

I sincerely hope that the next time we play them at the Walkers, we remember that we are not obliged to give them any more than 2,000 tickets.

Lets hope the 2,000 that have been able to get tickets really get behind the lads and are having a party at the end of the game instead of spending a drunken weekend in Edinburgh with a gay trainee accountant.

Quite.

 

[homer]

I sincerely hope that the next time we play them at the Walkers, we remember that we are not obliged to give them any more than 2,000 tickets.
.

That might be a long, long way away

 

[bocadillo]

That might be a long, long way away

Aye.



... or never.



:icon_sad:

 

[Melton Fox]

No, he didn't - and I can't imagine why he is saying he did.

Melton is quite aware that he is only one infraction from a ban after his last round of nonsense. If he had been infracted today, he would now be banned - which he isn't.

OK, just re-read it.

I feel truly "let off" and relieved that it was just an official warning and not an official "infraction". I am humbled.

TBH, I didn't know there was a difference. I see standing in the corner, and standing outside the class as two similar punishments. I am now fully educated.

Anyway, if my crime was a "threat of physical violence" how come I've only been given a warning? Is it not a more serious offence than that? Or was it just felt that a "gesture" should be made?

 

[bocadillo]

Anyway, if my crime was a "threat of physical violence" how come I've only been given a warning? Is it not a more serious offence than that? Or was it just felt that a "gesture" should be made?

I presume that it was thought that nobody would want the forum to be without your often-witty repartee.

 

[Melton Fox]

I presume that it was though that nobody would want the forum to be without your often-witty repartee.

I take it the question is answerless then :icon_roll

 

[bocadillo]

I take it the question is answerless then :icon_roll

That is the answer.

 

[bocadillo]

That is the answer.

Sorry - that is MY answer. I would not seek to speak for everybody.