Talking Balls gets a slagging

[Steven]

http://www.foxestalk.co.uk/forums/index.php?showtopic=67424

Reminds me of when the boards first split. :icon_roll :icon_bigg

 

[Orifice]

It seems my words are taken literally.

I wonder what else could be said that would be taken in the same manner.

 

[Profondo Rosso]

I've looked over FoxesTalk a couple of times and it is full of harbro and lanxfox-esque ott fantasist mongs anyway, luckily we only have to put up with a couple of them, I think I'd go mad if I posted there.

It's still better than the 606 boards though.

 

[buzzer_b]

Idiots.

 

[glyn]

The third post represents a real lack understanding of sarcasm. The point macky responded to represents a real lack of common sense.

 

[DesertFox]

Shhhhh! If we keep talking about them some of them might come over here.

 

[Profondo Rosso]

BMs post made me laugh. Didn't even notice it before he pointed it out.

 

[Hazzman]

They are reading what they want to read from the thread despite it being split with opinions

It's very cliquey there. Words such as 'mong' and 'this' are very in fashion. Windowlickers is another.

Rather unsurprisingly none of the lads who played in the charity match have posted on there.

 

[homer]

Pickled Onion flavour

 

[Jeff]

The person who's complaining about it taking him to the last post in the thread is presumably not a member here. The system doesn't know what he's read before, because he's not a member. If he clicks on the

it will take him to the first post in the thread. It's not difficult. It even says that when you hover over the symbol.

If I go to their forum and click on a thread I've already read it takes me to the first post. So I have to go through pages of stuff to find something I've not read. Presumably if I was a member there would be a way to go to the first unread post.

It's easy to slag things off if you can't be bothered to learn the basics of how they work.

 

[The Major]

A little touchy aren't we?

 

[Macky]

The person who's complaining about it taking him to the last post in the thread is presumably not a member here. The system doesn't know what he's read before, because he's not a member. If he clicks on the

it will take him to the first post in the thread. It's not difficult. It even says that when you hover over the symbol.

If I go to their forum and click on a thread I've already read it takes me to the first post. So I have to go through pages of stuff to find something I've not read. Presumably if I was a member there would be a way to go to the first unread post.

It's easy to slag things off if you can't be bothered to learn the basics of how they work.

I thought that, but it was more fun to just tell him he's wrong.
They have a 'Go to last unread post' icon at the start of each thread title. It's like here, but the other way around. In many ways.

 

[Macky]

A little touchy aren't we?

Is that the royal 'we'?

 

[Leesoh]

The person who's complaining about it taking him to the last post in the thread is presumably not a member here. The system doesn't know what he's read before, because he's not a member. If he clicks on the

it will take him to the first post in the thread. It's not difficult. It even says that when you hover over the symbol.

If I go to their forum and click on a thread I've already read it takes me to the first post. So I have to go through pages of stuff to find something I've not read. Presumably if I was a member there would be a way to go to the first unread post.

It's easy to slag things off if you can't be bothered to learn the basics of how they work.

I thought that, but it was more fun to just tell him he's wrong.
They have a 'Go to last unread post' icon at the start of each thread title. It's like here, but the other way around. In many ways.

He's great to have an argument with; it'll end up being cyclical, then he'll announce he's won the argument, and keep on reminding you at any available opportunity, despite the fact he's metaphorically talking out of his bottom.

Good luck anyway.

 

[Cate Fox]

What a load of shite...

 

[homer]

My favourite bit :

If macky is indicative of Talking Balls as a whole I think I'll stay here.

 

[fitz]

Looooooooooooooooolz

 

[Cate Fox]

I dont understand all of this "This." stuff... I'm obviously not down with the kidz lool

 

[Mawsley]

I dont understand all of this "This." stuff... I'm obviously not down with the kidz lool

It's too tough to type coherent sentences when you're waving your shoes full of Monster Munch in the air.

 

[fitz]

I dont understand all of this "This." stuff... I'm obviously not down with the kidz lool

Probably a good thing really.