Team vs. Ipswich
- Thread starter Micky
- Start date
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase
- Status
Micky
Well-Known Member
Micky
Well-Known Member
i do believe that we have some players that are slightly less cack than others. i.e. hammond = totally cack and hume = slightly cack. Thats why it matters who is picked. We could be a team of either complete cack or a team of quite cack.
Last edited:
Team for Ipswich - an away game that we want to knick. We really need to set up with our strongest defenders which meansKenton and Nisse at fullbacks, a bit more no nonsense than the alternatives.
Then we need Weso to sit in front of the back four chasing everything that moves and giving the ball to Johnson. Porter and Yeates need to give the Horse some pace to lay off too with Fryatt looking to get them round the back as often as poss. Kenton and Johansson need to give Yeates and Porter a bit of support so that they don't have to do it all on their own.
Potentially a good side
Logan
Kenton McAuley Kisnorbo Johannsson
Wesolowski/Tiatto
Yeates Porter
Johnson
Horsefield Fryatt*
Subs: Hume, Stearman, Hammond*, Henderson, Cadamarteri
Then we need Weso to sit in front of the back four chasing everything that moves and giving the ball to Johnson. Porter and Yeates need to give the Horse some pace to lay off too with Fryatt looking to get them round the back as often as poss. Kenton and Johansson need to give Yeates and Porter a bit of support so that they don't have to do it all on their own.
Potentially a good side
Logan
Kenton McAuley Kisnorbo Johannsson
Wesolowski/Tiatto
Yeates Porter
Johnson
Horsefield Fryatt*
Subs: Hume, Stearman, Hammond*, Henderson, Cadamarteri
Mike - True Blue Tinter
Well-Known Member
If you are going to nick it, you will have to some pressure on their goal as well as defend ours.
Henderson
Kenton McAuley Kisnorbo Johannson
Yeates Tiatto Porter
Hume
Horsfield Hammond
Subs: Logan, Stearman, Wesolowski, Cadamarteri, Fryatt
Henderson
Kenton McAuley Kisnorbo Johannson
Yeates Tiatto Porter
Hume
Horsfield Hammond
Subs: Logan, Stearman, Wesolowski, Cadamarteri, Fryatt
Horsfield and De Vries I'm guessing
fitz
Well-Known Member
not likely to cause much confusion this season, why De Vries was given 9 when he was never going to play....RK sense making again? i doubt we are going to try and nick this game either, we want a point a game from now on remember, unlike the rest of the season where we've been looking for 3 points and a 10 goal lead each game
highland fox
New Member
We have a squadful of No.2's...
Mike - True Blue Tinter
Well-Known Member
I did notice that it said we beat Cardiff 3-2 !
Biff
Active Member
Last edited:
londonfox
Well-Known Member
Isn't Stephen Hughes a p!le of sh!te?
Swap Glombard and Yeates if that's the case. Yeates is supposed to be a playmaker. I just want to see something different.
londonfox
Well-Known Member
That's a pretty weak midfield mate...
Mike - True Blue Tinter
Well-Known Member
I agree. I would play Hume in midfield as the attacking midfielder alongside Tiatto as the defensive midfielder.
If you're going to play 4-3-3 you don't then put two wingers in midfield, Tiatto would be overrun in the middle by himself.
If you want to play 4-3-3 it would be better to have Tiatto, Wesolowski and Johnson in midfield, you'd then want to get some width from your front players.
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
| 2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
| 3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
| 4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
| 5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
| 6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
| 7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
| 8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
| 9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
| 10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
| 11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
| 12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
| 14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
| 15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
| 16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
| 17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
| 19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
| 20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |
