Terry Connor
- Thread starter alex
- Start date
- Status
Kingy_85
Active Member
I do hope that this is a joke.
I wouldn't want that soppy failure anywhere near the club.
pork pie fox
Well-Known Member
That's shit.
Macky
Gruntled Member
Completely full of it
indierich06
Active Member
He's widely regarded as a fantastic coach and is well respected by many managers and players, trying to keep Wolves up was like trying to stop the Titanic going down - it was never going to happen. Just because he couldn't do that, doesn't somehow make him a failure or a bad coach. Wouldn't mind him here at all and I think it's a joke that Wolves sacked him.
Macky
Gruntled Member
Terry Nappy on the other hand, definitely can be a soppy failure at times
Blaarev
Well-Known Member
Wolves probably sacked him at the wrong time. The new manager and him was never going to work well togheter considering TC wanted to continue as manager.
pork pie fox
Well-Known Member
Maybe Terry Connor's problem was that felt like he wasn't disposable?
Kingy_85
Active Member
Everything you have said is true but it only takes one action to ruin a man and my guess is that TC taking over and failing to keep them up has ended his career. You could see it in his face towards the end of last season. Utterly destroyed.
Redditch Fox
Well-Known Member
I would say he is completely hopeless.
Even if he isn't hopeless he portrays the impression that he hasn't a clue.
Basically, the Wolves drastically under invested and paid the inevitable price. McCarthy is a decent manager of poor sides. He only gets poor sides because bigger clubs won't employ him - but he was doing as well as anyone was likely to do at the Wolves. That said having watched them in a couple of games I knew they were rubbish. Appointing Connor was a statement of defeat by the wolves board - I suppose that they understood that anyone any good would have more sense than to try to save the ship last season.
Even if he isn't hopeless he portrays the impression that he hasn't a clue.
Basically, the Wolves drastically under invested and paid the inevitable price. McCarthy is a decent manager of poor sides. He only gets poor sides because bigger clubs won't employ him - but he was doing as well as anyone was likely to do at the Wolves. That said having watched them in a couple of games I knew they were rubbish. Appointing Connor was a statement of defeat by the wolves board - I suppose that they understood that anyone any good would have more sense than to try to save the ship last season.
indierich06
Active Member
We wouldn't want him to be a manager, we'd want him to be a coach. Do you think Wolves getting relegated has made him forget how to coach players? What's he going to do? Retire?
Redditch Fox
Well-Known Member
But the Wolves were a failing team when he was a coach
Macky
Gruntled Member
They were also playing at Molineux, maybe they should relocate?
Correlation is not causation
Kingy_85
Active Member
No I wouldn't want him in any capacity.
- Status
Championship
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Leicester | 44 | 94 |
| 2 | Leeds Utd | 45 | 90 |
| 3 | Ipswich | 44 | 90 |
| 4 | Southampton | 45 | 84 |
| 5 | Norwich City | 45 | 73 |
| 6 | West Brom | 45 | 72 |
| 7 | Hull City | 45 | 70 |
| 8 | Middlesbro | 45 | 66 |
| 9 | Coventry City | 44 | 64 |
| 10 | Preston | 44 | 63 |
| 11 | Bristol City | 45 | 62 |
| 12 | Cardiff City | 45 | 62 |
| 13 | Swansea City | 45 | 57 |
| 14 | Watford | 45 | 56 |
| 15 | Sunderland | 45 | 56 |
| 16 | Millwall | 45 | 56 |
| 17 | QPR | 45 | 53 |
| 18 | Stoke City | 45 | 53 |
| 19 | Blackburn | 45 | 50 |
| 20 | Sheffield W | 45 | 50 |
| 21 | Plymouth | 45 | 48 |
| 22 | Birmingham | 45 | 47 |
| 23 | Huddersfield | 45 | 45 |
| 24 | Rotherham Utd | 45 | 24 |
