LoopisDeLupis
Well-Known Member
Managed to spend nothing and blow the PSR rules out of the water. Takes a special kind of talent.
Managed to spend nothing and blow the PSR rules out of the water. Takes a special kind of talent.
Is there the same table for transfer fees received?
Is there the same table for transfer fees received?
I'd guess we've done quite well in that aspect but it just shows how ridiculous our wage bill is.
Wages has been a constant issue for us though - years of having near 100% of revenue spent on wages which is just completely unsustainable for any business - our annual income has been tied up with wages alone, hence little to no transfers without selling first.It's from Kieran Maguire and he's working on that one so I'll post when it's done.
Transfermarket reckon our net spend over the last decade is about £150m. This is significantly lower than the net spend of Notts Forest who spent most of that time outside the PL and about half the net spend of someone like Bournemouth.
Comparatively, we haven't spent excessively and we've made a lot back in terms of sales - over half a billion in that time.
Our problem (and it's not a new point I know) is that we've massively overpaid for shite without a resale value and then we pay them all far too much so they don't leave.
Clowns (Aiyawatt, Rudkin and Whelan) will be clowns.
Money does not equal motivation.Wages has been a constant issue for us though - years of having near 100% of revenue spent on wages which is just completely unsustainable for any business - our annual income has been tied up with wages alone, hence little to no transfers without selling first.
If we had managed to sell some of the players we've let go for free instead then it would have helped but the wages for shite has been crippling us for years.
Teams like us cannot afford to have numerous players on £50k a week just for turning up for training each week, it's absolute madness and there is little to no incentive for bang average players when they have been financially sorted for life in a couple of years.
How in the blue hell can Chelsea get away with a 1.6billion spend. **** a duck.
Wages has been a constant issue for us though - years of having near 100% of revenue spent on wages which is just completely unsustainable for any business - our annual income has been tied up with wages alone, hence little to no transfers without selling first.
If we had managed to sell some of the players we've let go for free instead then it would have helped but the wages for shite has been crippling us for years.
Teams like us cannot afford to have numerous players on £50k a week just for turning up for training each week, it's absolute madness and there is little to no incentive for bang average players when they have been financially sorted for life in a couple of years.
The amount of utter shit we have signed makes the number of £258,000,000 seem almost unfathomable.
Senior Mirror journalist reporting that our vice captain and so called dressing room leader was the one pushing for a move to our main relegation rivals.
Senior Mirror journalist reporting that our vice captain and so called dressing room leader was the one pushing for a move to our main relegation rivals.
Too rightI mean, can you blame the poor ****? Almost everyone around him has given up and he spends most of his time on the bench watching hopeless twats like Okoli and Faes and that old bloke from Spurs trip over each other.
I would have thought dry cake was more crumbly.Crumbling like wet cake
Under PSR yes for the owner no, he is a multi billionaire and could probably spend far more than he is allowed to. PSR is there to keep the status quo with the current so called top 6, Newcastle, Villa face steep opposition in the form of regulation to break that threshold.Wages has been a constant issue for us though - years of having near 100% of revenue spent on wages which is just completely unsustainable for any business - our annual income has been tied up with wages alone, hence little to no transfers without selling first.
If we had managed to sell some of the players we've let go for free instead then it would have helped but the wages for shite has been crippling us for years.
Teams like us cannot afford to have numerous players on £50k a week just for turning up for training each week, it's absolute madness and there is little to no incentive for bang average players when they have been financially sorted for life in a couple of years.
Under PSR yes for the owner no, he is a multi billionaire and could probably spend far more than he is allowed to. PSR is there to keep the status quo with the current so called top 6, Newcastle, Villa face steep opposition in the form of regulation to break that threshold.
For us the points deficit ( The prem could have resolved the issue before the season commenced) hit us hard not only with recruiting a manager (potter) but more critically how do you persuade a player to join with a potential 15 points deficit hanging over the club?
Move that into January how do you recruit players to a club that face almost certain relegation and a potential points deduction if relegated?
Who decides wages, Rudkin? The chairman must surely now see that he must conduct an overhaul of his board and look to bring in fresh perspectives?
The only positive with this window is that resisted the urge to panic buy.
For me the solution to PSR is that clubs who break it are fined pound for pound spent and that is then distributed across all of the clubs who did not break it.
Hindsight and all that but spending the money on the training ground instead of the stadium expansion/development has really cost us in numerous ways.PSR is being replaced after this season.
The new rules will focus on spending limits tied to a percentage of your revenue. This aligns with UEFA rules.
It's a good job LCFC spent the last few years growing the club with stadium development and encouraging new supporters. Oh.
I mean, can you blame the poor ****?
There's every chance that I've misunderstood the PSR rules, but I think that investment into the training grounds is one of those things we can offset against other losses for PSR purposes. Likewise, funding the women's team (and especially giving them the old training ground and getting them playing at the KP) has allowed more money to be spent elsewhere. The problem is that most of that money has been wasted.Hindsight and all that but spending the money on the training ground instead of the stadium expansion/development has really cost us in numerous ways.
There's every chance that I've misunderstood the PSR rules, but I think that investment into the training grounds is one of those things we can offset against other losses for PSR purposes. Likewise, funding the women's team (and especially giving them the old training ground and getting them playing at the KP) has allowed more money to be spent elsewhere. The problem is that most of that money has been wasted.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 23 | 56 |
2 | Arsenal | 24 | 50 |
3 | Nottm F | 24 | 47 |
4 | Chelsea | 24 | 43 |
5 | Manchester C | 24 | 41 |
6 | Newcastle | 24 | 41 |
7 | Bournemouth | 24 | 40 |
8 | Aston Villa | 24 | 37 |
9 | Fulham | 24 | 36 |
10 | Brighton | 24 | 34 |
11 | Brentford | 24 | 31 |
12 | Palace | 24 | 30 |
13 | Manchester U | 24 | 29 |
14 | Tottenham | 24 | 27 |
15 | West Ham | 24 | 27 |
16 | Everton | 23 | 26 |
17 | Wolves | 24 | 19 |
18 | Leicester | 24 | 17 |
19 | Ipswich | 24 | 16 |
20 | Southampton | 24 | 9 |