The manager search - what a way to run a football club!!

[bocadillo]

yes.

He lied.

 

[Dour]

Here a question for you.

Why was redknapp praised for pompys promotion by you guys, but holloway relieved of the burden of relegation which was passed onto MM?

I don't think many objected or thought it unfair when Holloway was relieved of the burden of his job.

 

[Chrysalis]

He lied.

Will speak to him again on this issue then.

 

[Biffa Bacon]

He lied.

I'm not sure about this but didn't Milan only buy about 90% of the outstanding shares and the all of the newly created shares at the time of his takeover, this may mean that there are a few small shareholders left but Milan has the right to force them to sell if he wants to.

Maybe wrong as the whole saga around the sale of city was too dull to bother taking much notice of.

 

[Foxes_Trust]

Will speak to him again on this issue then.

MM paid out the 10% required to all former shareholders at the turn of the year, as part of the signed sale agreement, once the shareholders received formal notification he was to do this, every shareholder had no choice other than to receive the money.

The only exception is the nominal shareholding held by Teachers (owners of the ground)

Those who didn't agree to sell would have been compulsory purchased (triggered when over 90% of shareholder value agreed to sell)

 

[bocadillo]

I'm not sure about this but didn't Milan only buy about 90% of the outstanding shares and the all of the newly created shares at the time of his takeover, this may mean that there are a few small shareholders left but Milan has the right to force them to sell if he wants to.

Maybe wrong as the whole saga around the sale of city was too dull to bother taking much notice of.

MM paid out the 10% required to all former shareholders at the turn of the year, as part of the signed sale agreement, once the shareholders received formal notification he was to do this, every shareholder had no choice other than to receive the money.

The only exception is the nominal shareholding held by Teachers (owners of the ground)

Those who didn't agree to sell would have been compulsory purchased (triggered when over 90% of shareholder value agreed to sell)

Phew!! I was about to issue an interim apology to Chrysalis last night when Biffa Bacon suggested I might be wrong. Thank you, Foxes Trust - you do have your uses.

 

[Dour]

Anyone catch the Mandaric interview on Radio 5 this morning? Mandaric obviously turned up expecting a wodge of free publicity based around his employing Nige, but was given a stiff grilling over his hiring and firing record - especially over Allen.

Oddly, Mandaric reckoned he'd only sacked 2 managers. Anyone know which of Kelly, Allen and Holloway resigned?

 

[Jeff]

Oddly, Mandaric reckoned he'd only sacked 2 managers. Anyone know which of Kelly, Allen and Holloway resigned?

I think he meant he'd only sacked two of his managers, so Kelly doesn't count.

At least he's now admitted he sacked them, rather than the 'mutual consent' nonsense.

 

[Chrysalis]

MM paid out the 10% required to all former shareholders at the turn of the year, as part of the signed sale agreement, once the shareholders received formal notification he was to do this, every shareholder had no choice other than to receive the money.

The only exception is the nominal shareholding held by Teachers (owners of the ground)

Those who didn't agree to sell would have been compulsory purchased (triggered when over 90% of shareholder value agreed to sell)

Ok thanks, deffo seems I been lied to then. He clearly said he still a shareholder.