Foxes_Never_Quit said:But think for a minute.
My first reaction when I saw that was to feel saddened.
But does it really **** matter what colour the seats are!?
"The stadium would be re-branded - inside and out, to reflect its joint ownership and a new playing surface would be installed to accommodate both football and rugby
homer said:Can't wait for this:
"The stadium would be re-branded - inside and out, to reflect its joint ownership and a new playing surface would be installed to accommodate both football and rugby"
Joe_Fox said:Foxes_Never_Quit said:But think for a minute.
My first reaction when I saw that was to feel saddened.
But does it really **** matter what colour the seats are!?
No, as long as they are blue or white.
webmaster said:Joe_Fox said:Foxes_Never_Quit said:But think for a minute.
My first reaction when I saw that was to feel saddened.
But does it really **** matter what colour the seats are!?
No, as long as they are blue or white.
We managed OK with orange seats in the old family stand at Filbert Street.
Tony Elsby said:Said Levein: "With a 15 man line up we should have more options going forward - particularly as Martin Johnson should be able to clear a path wide enough for even Connolly or Scowcroft to score.
Brauny Blue said:homer wrote:
"The stadium would be re-branded - inside and out, to reflect its joint ownership and a new playing surface would be installed to accommodate both football and rugby
Ha a giant sand pit then
Dunc said:A point on the pitch.
As someone who works in the artificial & by association real turf industry (don't ask) its not rocket science to blend artificial grass with real grasses to ensure the turf doesn't cut up.
If that is a concern to people then it shouldn't be. The pitch shouldn't, if designed properly, cut up or become any more boggy than usual.
As you seem to be the man in the know, if it is so easy how come other clubs have not done this with thier playing surfaces? Man U's pitch is awful at times and needs relaying, now they have money to burn but why not go down this route, surely there must be a draw back to using it?
Naughty Fox said:Dunc said:A point on the pitch.
As someone who works in the artificial & by association real turf industry (don't ask) its not rocket science to blend artificial grass with real grasses to ensure the turf doesn't cut up.
If that is a concern to people then it shouldn't be. The pitch shouldn't, if designed properly, cut up or become any more boggy than usual.
As you seem to be the man in the know, if it is so easy how come other clubs have not done this with thier playing surfaces? Man U's pitch is awful at times and needs relaying, now they have money to burn but why not go down this route, surely there must be a draw back to using it?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |