Ashov said:Did we pay one for him or is it not sorted out yet ?
trickytrev said:So if someone was able to say how long Williams was at Forrest it would give us a clearer indication.
SamuearlJackson said:so if some other less talented player who came up in the youth system with Williams were to leave now too would forest want the same compensation?! thought not, though there should be no reason why williams would be worth more if the rules are strictly adhered to (maybe you could argue that as williams played more 1st team football his training cost more but not several million more!!!).
SamJ
trickytrev said:SamuearlJackson said:so if some other less talented player who came up in the youth system with Williams were to leave now too would forest want the same compensation?! thought not, though there should be no reason why williams would be worth more if the rules are strictly adhered to (maybe you could argue that as williams played more 1st team football his training cost more but not several million more!!!).
SamJ
They have had to pay Williams wages during this time.
JKFOX said:realistically it shouldnt be more than 500k.
Steven said:JKFOX said:realistically it shouldnt be more than 500k.
Typical of a club wanting its cake and eating it. :roll:
Trentside Toby said:Come on people, read between the lines a bit. Forest don't expect a seven-figure fee. They're just trying to influence the tribunal slightly by stressing that they rate him highly - just as Leicester were putting a marker down with that 75k bid. For the record, I'm sure it will be 400-500k.
And hello by the way. I might stick around for some good-natured discussion if you think you can tolerate a "Red Dog" on here.
Trentside Toby said:Come on people, read between the lines a bit. Forest don't expect a seven-figure fee. They're just trying to influence the tribunal slightly by stressing that they rate him highly - just as Leicester were putting a marker down with that 75k bid. For the record, I'm sure it will be 400-500k.
And hello by the way. I might stick around for some good-natured discussion if you think you can tolerate a "Red Dog" on here.
Trentside Toby said:Come on people, read between the lines a bit. Forest don't expect a seven-figure fee. They're just trying to influence the tribunal slightly by stressing that they rate him highly - just as Leicester were putting a marker down with that 75k bid. For the record, I'm sure it will be 400-500k.
And hello by the way. I might stick around for some good-natured discussion if you think you can tolerate a "Red Dog" on here.
Trentside Toby said:Come on people, read between the lines a bit. Forest don't expect a seven-figure fee. They're just trying to influence the tribunal slightly by stressing that they rate him highly - just as Leicester were putting a marker down with that 75k bid. For the record, I'm sure it will be 400-500k.
webmaster said:Trentside Toby said:Come on people, read between the lines a bit. Forest don't expect a seven-figure fee. They're just trying to influence the tribunal slightly by stressing that they rate him highly - just as Leicester were putting a marker down with that 75k bid. For the record, I'm sure it will be 400-500k.
But neither club's valuation will have an effect on the amount of compensation payable, it has nothing to do with the valuations, how good he is, how many matches he's played, or how much he gets paid. Theonly thing the compensation is for is to cover the cost of his training and education.
FIFA's rules say the compensation payable is £40,000 for each year of training he's had between the ages of 12 and 21. So if he joined f*rest at 16 we'd have to pay £240,000 to f*rest, but we might also have to pay a fee to any club(s) he was with from the age of 12 to 16.
The tribunal doesn't have to strictly stick to FIFA's rules, but usually they add extras like sell on clauses and extra payments after a certain number of games, and keep the initial fee low.
This is obviously the crux - if it were 100% formulaic Forest wouldn't be posturing. And why would Leicester make an offer way below the cumulative training costs for Williams if not to try to influence the tribunal's decision about these extras?webmaster said:The tribunal doesn't have to strictly stick to FIFA's rules, but usually they add extras like sell on clauses and extra payments after a certain number of games, and keep the initial fee low.
Trentside Toby said:And why would Leicester make an offer way below the cumulative training costs for Williams if not to try to influence the tribunal's decision about these extras?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |