Unfortunately they have to be though don't they?
Not enough creativity in the side without them.
Yep, he should have come on at half time.Albrighton was superb. Always gives 100% as well
Meanwhile James Maddison spotted golfing this afternoon. Deary me.
Kilworth Springs allegedlyOh jesus, tell me it ain't so. The **** can **** right off if that's the case,
Castagne is a quality player. But by using him as a utility player we are doing him a disservice. A good coach would work out his best position and play him there regularly. It’s great in theory having players who can play in multiple positions but it’s not good for the individual player.But alas no, apparently Luke Thomas on so that Castagne could play at centre back was deemed to be the better option...
But you can explain your last paragraph with your first.A lot will be made of those players who broke the rules and weren’t available, and rightly so, they should be pilloried. But even without them, with the right professionalism, approach, and attitude we easily could have come away without defeat.
Another *massive* game where we’ve come up short by a long way under Rodgers. Spurs away last season, Utd at home on the final day, Villa cup semi-finals, Chelsea in the FA Cup; the list is too long for it to be coincidence or bad luck.
Even before they scored we had created nothing. It was a meh performance at best to that point. We then went behind and crumbled. And our supposed top coach did the square root of ****-all to alter things. Even if Amartey was injured, the half-time change was baffling at best and nonsensical at worst.
We got a goal back because of a mistake by them, which to be fair to Kelechi was capitalized on very well. West Ham then retreated but in reality for all our possession we didn’t create a glut of good chances.
The fact that we came up short on a big occasion is no longer baffling to me, it’s what I expect under RodgersWe don't know the effect on the rest of the team of making those players 'unavailable'. It may have been difficult to focus pre-match with those rumblings going on, and any last minute changes to training and match prep over the week.
But, yes, in theory the team we fielded ought have been enough to hold off an ordinary WH team. That we didn't, and yet again seemed to come up short on a big occasion is a little baffling. We were poor, again.
Hopefully a change of focus (for the semi next weekend) will be a chance to regroup and refresh. Win it, and we'll hopefully get a bounce and 'feel good' back into our game. We've got to rise to the challenge of the not throwing away our CL spot.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 17 | 42 |
2 | Chelsea | 18 | 35 |
3 | Nottm F | 18 | 34 |
4 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
5 | Newcastle | 18 | 29 |
6 | Bournemouth | 18 | 29 |
7 | Manchester C | 18 | 28 |
8 | Fulham | 18 | 28 |
9 | Aston Villa | 18 | 28 |
10 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
11 | Tottenham | 18 | 23 |
12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
13 | West Ham | 18 | 23 |
14 | Manchester U | 18 | 22 |
15 | Everton | 17 | 17 |
16 | Palace | 18 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 18 | 15 |
18 | Leicester | 18 | 14 |
19 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 18 | 6 |