Hazzman
New Member
That debate again. Given we now have 8 fit players again and given Christmas time as well means that holidays will be little on the ground, we have came to that aged ol' debate again.
I am all for keeping everyone happy. However, if it's simply not possible if we have 8 players doing alright but again if we have 7 winning games, then someone is bound to be left out.
There's 3 ways we could resolve this IMO:
a) We play with 8.
Which has been tried before and doomed. Tried it a couple of times and given the price now to play, it's not value for money plus it's difficult to keep track of.
b) Select 7 on performance.
This will upset people from time to time but would probably get the best results for us.
c) Rotation
Everyone takes turn to miss a game.
Views and Thoughts please
I am all for keeping everyone happy. However, if it's simply not possible if we have 8 players doing alright but again if we have 7 winning games, then someone is bound to be left out.
There's 3 ways we could resolve this IMO:
a) We play with 8.
Which has been tried before and doomed. Tried it a couple of times and given the price now to play, it's not value for money plus it's difficult to keep track of.
b) Select 7 on performance.
This will upset people from time to time but would probably get the best results for us.
c) Rotation
Everyone takes turn to miss a game.
Views and Thoughts please