pork pie fox
Well-Known Member
![www.leicestermercury.co.uk](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fi2-prod.leicestermercury.co.uk%2Fsport%2Ffootball%2Farticle3518370.ece%2FALTERNATES%2Fs1200%2F0_Brendan-Rodgers-109.jpg&hash=b8fdefad5530a355bb578dd47d058772&return_error=1)
Leicester 'really interested' in €30m Man United target
The Juventus youngster has only made just three appearances for his club so far this season after making the move to Turin from fellow Italian side Sassuolo.
Why are people having a go at Nacho again? OK, he didn't pull up any trees against Norwich; who did??? He has shown real promise in the previous outings this season. We don't have the attacking numbers to let him go and we should get behind him, not disparage him on the supporters pages!
Are those that praised him for two decent performances not allowed to criticise him when he played abysmally?Why are people having a go at Nacho again? OK, he didn't pull up any trees against Norwich; who did??? He has shown real promise in the previous outings this season. We don't have the attacking numbers to let him go and we should get behind him, not disparage him on the supporters pages!
Is this your moment of the decade?He was an absolute embarrassment against Norwich.
I don't think he was bad. In fact, I think he was better than Maddison, Tielemans and Soyuncu who were absolutely appalling. I won't however, jump on the 'He's a great player now' bandwagon either. Two good performances and some folk are getting just a tad carried away. We should still look to bring in a goal scorer in January and if that means shipping out Iheanacho then I'll not be too fussed about it. If he happens to get better, then great for us but let's see some consistency first before we talk about some miraculous turnaround. This need for consistency may prove the issue however because when he plays and we change the system, we may as well not bother with Tielemans in the squad as we lose his biggest qualities when having to play so narrow.Are those that praised him for two decent performances not allowed to criticise him when he played abysmally?
He was an absolute embarrassment against Norwich.
We'd love McNeil. We're short of a headless chicken.
He didn't play badly at all. He just made a bad decision, probably due to over eagerness to do well.Are those that praised him for two decent performances not allowed to criticise him when he played abysmally?
He was an absolute embarrassment against Norwich.
Maybe so, but when Danny Ings and Andros Townsend might be available, who are we to argue ?
He didn't play badly at all. He just made a bad decision, probably due to over eagerness to do well.
No no, no Nacho!McNeil? Didn't see him do one thing positive all game for us.
You’ll get panned for it but those stats don’t lie.I'm not entirely sure what all the dislike towards Ings is. I'm not saying he's the world's greatest striker but in his first and only full season in the PL he scored 11 goals in 35 games, in his next half-fit season he scored 7 goals in 24 and now he's fit again 9 goals in 16 which is a very good return considering how shit Southampton are. His fitness has been an issue but he's aggressive, a good finisher and still only 27 so with good fitness I'd say his best years are probably ahead.
Weren’t we linked to him in the past?Leicester City are likely to have an offer accepted for Juventus defender Daniele Rugani. - from the Mockery
It's the mercury so probablyWeren’t we linked to him in the past?
Weren’t we linked to him in the past?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |