Profondo Rosso
Well-Known Member
Why does everyone go on about Bloomfield and MON when Gillies was about 20 times more successful than either?
Why does everyone go on about Bloomfield and MON when Gillies was about 20 times more successful than either?
I know, I was saying it's silly that Gillies never seems to remembered as well as MON and Bloomfield despite being more successful than either.
I've heard Boc's always going on about William Orr.
Bit harsh.
Bit harsh.
I remember when Bloomfield came he brought in Birchenall as a centreforward and then when Worthington came Birchenall moved back to become a very effective midfieldc player. But I cannot for the life of me remember who played alongside Birchenall and Worthington as a second striker before Earle came.
Wasn't it Earle's arrival that led to Birchenall taking a deeper role rather than Worthington's? I think the other player you are trying to think of is probably Jon Sammels.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Chelsea | 22 | 40 |
5 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
6 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 22 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |