Hazzman
New Member
personally I think you are just jumping to conclusions on most of the points. We don't and never will know what goes on behind closed doors at a football club, a lot of speculation goes on and always will. I have never heard the non contract story but I do know we got some money from Bolton when he left. IMO and a lot of others it was good to see the back of him. (Maybe he was on a trial and thats why there was no contract if that was true.)
The Hasselbaink issue could have evolved from a host of things, but I can remember a whole load of times when an old head has helped out and delivered.
As for Sousa being invited by Milan to the play off match, what's wrong with that? Also I know NP was being a pain in the arse at the club well before then. Maybe for Sousa it was for pre appointment talks.
Just to add, there was also the utter baffling signings associated with the appointment of Don McKay (to add Djeziri [whose career is particularly cloudy with his clubs] and Ferreira signed with no manager).
BG, you will not alter my opinion on all three things.
Maybe the Megson situation is debateable but Hasselbaink was played out live on telly and inviting Sousa was poor conduct regardless of Pearson's position.
Last edited: