FOX MENTAL
New Member
DesertFox said:just read that aswell, but where does he play??
Depending on what you mean, either defender or Dundee. 8)
Defence was th 1 i was looking for!! 8)
DesertFox said:just read that aswell, but where does he play??
Depending on what you mean, either defender or Dundee. 8)
Bobby Smith said:weluvulesta said:I think we will sign 1-2 players more, but thats it. I am guessing funds are rather tight and at the moment, we have to sell somebody to get a bit of cash. But the question is who could we sell, for how much, and are they really wanted.
Can't remember many times in the history of LCFC that we haven't had a single player that someone would pay a fee for
DesertFox said:If that was strictly the case, we wouldn't have just signed De Vries and Maybury, would we? I think there is always a little bit of room for maneuvering with football clubs - it's amazing how they can find 100K down the back of the sofa now and again!
clerkenwellfox said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/norwich/4154655.stm
Well that scuppers any idea that Scowy's off to Norwich then!
clerkenwellfox said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/n/norwich/4154655.stm
Well that scuppers any idea that Scowy's off to Norwich then!
DesertFox wrote:
Financially, things are still pretty dire but at least they're looking up. OK, the allocated budget for this season has been spent, but with the potential ground share, the last few nightmare huge contracts coming to an end, and a new manager who has obviously identified several players he wants who won't command large transfer fees or wages, the board may be tempted to make a bit of cash available. It would affect next season's budget presumably, but some of Levein's targets may not be available by the summer and the board will want to back the new man as much as they can.
So I wouldn't be too surprised to see us get another two or three new players. I think it would make reasonably good business sense, as long as we don't start splashing cash we haven't got or can't guarantee will be coming in the next few months.
Foxes_Trust wrote:
We haven't got cash without some departures & the club won't dip into next years budget, buying players based on future potential income is what put us into administration.
We could see more arrivals soon, but only after some departures, so savings are generated (be they wage savings or transfer fees)
DesertFox wrote:
If that was strictly the case, we wouldn't have just signed De Vries and Maybury, would we? I think there is always a little bit of room for maneuvering with football clubs - it's amazing how they can find 100K down the back of the sofa now and again!
Foxes_Trust wrote:
It is the case, we spoke to the club about the current financial picture relating to the transfer window only last week. The loans out so far may cover salaries this month but not any transfer fee - more will have to go.
McCahill explained: "The fact that a couple of players have gone out and (there are) potentially more to go out, we obviously stretched the budget a bit, perhaps (had) a look at encroaching on next year's budget a bit, a bit here and a bit there - all that has meant we could bring these players in.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |