City wallpapers.

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sylla?

Why?
 
yeh hardly a legend. just noticed they were done by chris rice.....that would be ricey would it??

i went for the linekar one me. just coz the picture on the far right he lloks like hes scuttling the invisible women. :038:
 
DurhamFox said:

Just thought it was an odd choice, that's all.

I wonder if Ricey had copyright approval to use those photos?
 
Joe_Fox said:
Just thought it was an odd choice, that's all.

I wonder if Ricey had copyright approval to use those photos?

I think Ricey said that BBC have a deal with empics or somebody to use their pictures, and since Ricey was making them for the BBC website, he was allowed to use the pictures.

But why does copyright come into it anyway? He isn't making money from them I don't think.

They're really good anyway, and I've had his Muzzy one on my desktop for about a week. Might change it to Momo now though. :)
 
Joe_Fox said:
Just thought it was an odd choice, that's all.

I wonder if Ricey had copyright approval to use those photos?

He will be our most exciting player this season.
 
DurhamFox said:
He will be our most exciting player this season.
Ricey?
Didn't know he played...
 
MKFox said:
Ricey?
Didn't know he played...

That's what I thought? Duracell on the wing?
 
webmaster said:
Just because someone's not making money from it doesn't make it legal!

Exactly, I think Ricey (and indeed the beeb) could be in hot water here.
 
Joe_Fox said:
Exactly, I think Ricey (and indeed the beeb) could be in hot water here.

are you perving at the turkish baths again joe? :081:
 
Joe_Fox said:
Exactly, I think Ricey (and indeed the beeb) could be in hot water here.

I'm sure the BBC will have permission to use the pictures. The bit I was arguing with is the odd notion that not making money from it somehow made breach of copyright legal.
 
webmaster said:
I'm sure the BBC will have permission to use the pictures. The bit I was arguing with is the odd notion that not making money from it somehow made breach of copyright legal.


I didn't say it wasn't illegal, I asked WHY it is.

What's the difference between those wallpapers, and say, somebody posting images from the OS on this board? That's all I meant, sorry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top