City wallpapers.

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sylla?

Why?
 
yeh hardly a legend. just noticed they were done by chris rice.....that would be ricey would it??

i went for the linekar one me. just coz the picture on the far right he lloks like hes scuttling the invisible women. :038:
 
DurhamFox said:

Just thought it was an odd choice, that's all.

I wonder if Ricey had copyright approval to use those photos?
 
Joe_Fox said:
Just thought it was an odd choice, that's all.

I wonder if Ricey had copyright approval to use those photos?

I think Ricey said that BBC have a deal with empics or somebody to use their pictures, and since Ricey was making them for the BBC website, he was allowed to use the pictures.

But why does copyright come into it anyway? He isn't making money from them I don't think.

They're really good anyway, and I've had his Muzzy one on my desktop for about a week. Might change it to Momo now though. :)
 
Joe_Fox said:
Just thought it was an odd choice, that's all.

I wonder if Ricey had copyright approval to use those photos?

He will be our most exciting player this season.
 
DurhamFox said:
He will be our most exciting player this season.
Ricey?
Didn't know he played...
 
MKFox said:
Ricey?
Didn't know he played...

That's what I thought? Duracell on the wing?
 
webmaster said:
Just because someone's not making money from it doesn't make it legal!

Exactly, I think Ricey (and indeed the beeb) could be in hot water here.
 
Joe_Fox said:
Exactly, I think Ricey (and indeed the beeb) could be in hot water here.

are you perving at the turkish baths again joe? :081:
 
Joe_Fox said:
Exactly, I think Ricey (and indeed the beeb) could be in hot water here.

I'm sure the BBC will have permission to use the pictures. The bit I was arguing with is the odd notion that not making money from it somehow made breach of copyright legal.
 
.....:icon_wink
 
webmaster said:
I'm sure the BBC will have permission to use the pictures. The bit I was arguing with is the odd notion that not making money from it somehow made breach of copyright legal.


I didn't say it wasn't illegal, I asked WHY it is.

What's the difference between those wallpapers, and say, somebody posting images from the OS on this board? That's all I meant, sorry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627

Latest posts

Top