Craig Levein, wholesale importer of substandard Scots

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.

Listy

New Member
Rewind a decade or so and it would not surprise many to see Southampton, Sheffield Wednesday, Leicester and Coventry congregated near the foot of a division. Then, however, all were Premiership clubs. Now their concern is staving off relegation from the Championship.

Coventry City and Sheffield Wednesday found themselves fighting a six-pointer last week.

The likelihood is that one will be in League One next season and, in all probability, they will face both Leeds United and Nottingham Forest there. While success in football can be cyclical - and such unpredictability makes a welcome change from the Premier League's seemingly eternal domination by the same four clubs - the reasons for their decline go beyond that.

A common denominator for all as well as other former top-flight clubs such as Leeds, Forest, Norwich, Ipswich and Crystal Palace was their failure to use their two years of parachute payments to fund a return to the top division. For chairmen of their rivals, that £11 million bonus represents an unfair advantage; squander it, however, and the consequences are severe.

That two-season window of opportunity tends to exert a pivotal impact upon clubs for years; either they regain the riches of top-flight football or, deprived of its benefits, struggle to recover from the removal of the additional income. Premier League expenditure makes debts spiral and the lower half of the Championship beckons for some, and League One for others.

Yet their fall is rarely accompanied by a drop in expectations while all too many believe the Premier League is their natural home. In contrast, it is notable how Stoke, Hull, Bristol City and Plymouth have prospered without similar pressure this season. They are not weighed down by their recent history.

Indeed, there is a sense clubs return to the Premier League within two years or not at all. Sunderland (twice), West Ham, Birmingham, Leicester (under Micky Adams) and West Brom (in the Gary Megson era) have managed a suitably swift response to demotion. Watford may yet emulate them this season, along with Albion. But the latter should have greater cause for concern; in their second year in the Championship, they may be more stable than most financially - Tony Mowbray turned in an eight-figure transfer market profit last year - but the precedents for sides stuck in the second flight are less healthy.

The Championship's most talented side also possess arguably its most pronounced self-destructive streak, and cost-cutting tends to be a feature of a third campaign in the second tier.

Southampton, for instance, sold Gareth Bale, Chris Baird and Kenwyne Jones last summer. Seemingly flush with cash, Coventry reacted to relegation by spending £5 million on Lee Hughes; within two years, Hughes himself, David Thompson, Magnus Hedman and Lee Carsley had led an exodus.

But whereas many sides who rapidly restored their top-flight status benefited from stability, this has not been an option for others. Mass departures of players have made overhauls inevitable.

For clubs such as Charlton, deserted by a host of players accustomed to top-flight football, this renders the first season after relegation one of consolidation. In turn, that means the second becomes a year of all or nothing. Incremental improvement is not an option as the decision-making becomes more frantic while the stakes get higher and the patience threshold becomes lower.

In such an environment, the wrong choice of manager can have lasting consequences. A few months after going down, Leicester appointed Craig Levein, wholesale importer of substandard Scots. After a year in the Championship, Crystal Palace hired Peter Taylor, for what swiftly turned out to be a mismatch. Norwich's recruitment of Peter Grant was still worse.

In each case, the second anniversary of demotion marked a turning point as the transformation from exiled Premier League club to a Championship regular, or worse. Norwich spent much of the first half of their third campaign in the relegation zone. Leeds were relegated in their third season in the Championship; Southampton may emulate them.



In each case, of course, there were other reasons for underachievement. The combined efforts of Ken Bates, Dennis Wise and Kevin Blackwell contributed to Leeds' demise. Southampton's needlessly long wait to appoint a successor to George Burley is one cause of their predicament; boardroom squabble and disputes over ownership have hardly helped them, or Coventry. Wednesday, with recent exposure to League One, can testify that their finances have never recovered from the loss of Premier League football.

As for Leicester, Milan Mandaric's surreal revolving door policy sees players and managers come and go at bewildering speed, at a huge loss and with a distinct absence of coherent thinking. That they could go down with statistically the division's best defence is perhaps the strangest element of the Championship's relegation battle.

Two historically successful teams in Nottingham Forest and Leeds find themselves stuck in League One.

But even the idiosyncratic Mandaric conforms to a wider trend of clubs trapped in a dangerous cycle of lesser funding, growing debts, increasing frustration and excessive expectations, while average players are unfavourably compared to their predecessors. New stadia provide a permanent reminder that they were designed with Premier League football in mind, not the visits of Hartlepool and Hereford.


And whoever accompanies Colchester and Scunthorpe into League One should provide a cautionary tale to Sheffield United and, probably, Charlton as they begin their final year of parachute payments.

The Blades, in appointing Bryan Robson, are already guilty of one major managerial misjudgement in that crucial two-year window and that bodes ill for them. And Derby's owners appear to have predicated their takeover on a plan of going down and then coming back up again. But it doesn't always work like that.

Sometimes what goes down just keeps falling.
 
Great post, with lots of good points. There's much more to what you've said than merely 'Craig Levein, wholesale importer of substandard Scots'... which is actually just a minor, subsidiary point that you make to a thread that analyses how clubs go into decline and the distorting impact of the 2 year parachute payments etc. Really interesting stuff. I don't think you make a single bad point.
 
Last edited:
It was obvious it was an article.


He's worse than Fludie
 
Just wondering whether Homer's primary occupation on this forum is to complain about people who post things that he's too lazy to read / stupid to understand.

The article, or post, or whatever you want to call it, made sense. It pinpoints one or two interesting trends. Take it or leave it, but I'd prefer it if you didn't bully people who've offered interesting observations on our club.

Just because you write 100 line-long messages instead of one 100 line-long message doesn't make your viewpoints any more valid or interesting.
 
Just wondering whether Homer's primary occupation on this forum is to complain about people who post things that he's too lazy to read / stupid to understand.

The article, or post, or whatever you want to call it, made sense. It pinpoints one or two interesting trends. Take it or leave it, but I'd prefer it if you didn't bully people who've offered interesting observations on our club.

Just because you write 100 line-long messages instead of one 100 line-long message doesn't make your viewpoints any more valid or interesting.


I read it all, I understood it perfectly, thank you very much. Nice of you to show such concern

Merely because something is relatively long, and reasonably well constructed, does not necessarily mean that it exhibits any genuine insight whatosever, or indeed raises issues that haven't been covered in great detail a million times before

But you obviously liked it, so I'm very pleased for you
 
Levein signed 19 players, including loanees. Three of them are Scottish.

Jeff you should know we arent interested in facts, its speculation and rumour that is gospel! :icon_wink
 
To be honest I wasn't especially bowled over by it, Mr. Homer. My synapses haven't ruptured at its explosively insightful profundity. However I thought it made a nice point or two, that's all. Yes these points have been made before, at times coherently and at times less so. I just tend to think we'd have a much more enlightened forum here if there were one or two less Thought Police shitting on everyone's parade. I'd sooner encourage City fans who are concerned by our club's pride to have their say - especially when you consider that one of our biggest problems is the unshifting silence which has descended on the club these past years - as opposed to ramming a sock-full of semtex down their throat the second they open their mouths.

And, significantly, whereas you've probably heard Mr. Lusty's opinions voiced by other people in the past, we haven't yet heard it from his own mouth have we? You, on the other hand, seem to have spurted forth your personalised brand of forum fascism on more than one occasion. Who, exactly, is detracting from the insightfulness of this forum?
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure what Homer has supposed to have done wrong, but I totally agree :)
 
To be honest I wasn't especially bowled over by it, Mr. Homer. My synapses haven't ruptured at its explosively insightful profundity. However I thought it made a nice point or two, that's all. Yes these points have been made before, at times coherently and at times less so. I just tend to think we'd have a much more enlightened forum here if there were one or two less Thought Police shitting on everyone's parade. I'd sooner encourage City fans who are concerned by our club's pride to have their say - especially when you consider that one of our biggest problems is the unshifting silence which has descended on the club these past years - as opposed to ramming a sock-full of semtex down their throat the second they open their mouths.

And, significantly, whereas you've probably heard Mr. Lusty's opinions voiced by other people in the past, we haven't yet heard it from his own mouth have we? You, on the other hand, seem to have spurted forth your personalised brand of forum fascism on more than one occasion. Who, exactly, is detracting from the insightfulness of this forum?

When and where has all this thought fascism by homer occurred?

Is there another forum that I'm not privy to?
Damned inner circle again!
 
I think it is hinting more at those useless feckers who plied their trade in Scotland, although thats down to personal interpretation.
 
I think it is hinting more at those useless feckers who plied their trade in Scotland, although thats down to personal interpretation.

So add deVries and Maybury.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

Championship

P Pld Pts
1Leicester4697
2Ipswich4696
3Leeds Utd4690
4Southampton4687
5West Brom4675
6Norwich City4673
7Hull City4670
8Middlesbro4669
9Coventry City4664
10Preston 4663
11Bristol City4662
12Cardiff City4662
13Millwall4659
14Swansea City4657
15Watford4656
16Sunderland4656
17Stoke City4656
18QPR4656
19Blackburn 4653
20Sheffield W4653
21Plymouth 4651
22Birmingham4650
23Huddersfield4645
24Rotherham Utd4627

Latest posts

Top