Match Thread Crystal Palace (a)

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can't understand why Pearson does not seem able to organise this team. This team selection smacks of desperation. Pearson can't surely be changing the formation again.
He does not seem to know what his best team or formation is. I really hope we string some wins together, but I fear for today.
1-1.

Shall we wait until they actually start playing???!!
 
Could just be a rest?

Very true. Wasn't aware of any with both playing the full 90 though. Hope that is the case as these two have been very consistent in an under performing team. Not sure how I feel about Schlupp starting again. Obviously he's a talent and they need bleeding but thought Beckford looked a big improvement on him when he came on.
 
Stop talking out of your arse. Kennedy and Moore have performed very well on loan in the first half of the season. Pelts and Konchesky have been competent but how many goals have we conceded with an unchallenged cross from a flank. I can think of three in the past month

There is no need to be rude: if City take a point, or lose by the odd goal, then this is a reasonable line up - and I am (not for the first time) wrong. A good hiding, and I think Pearson will deserve criticism.
 
Shame, for ex-pats like me (too cheap to buy foxes player). I'll have to hope they forget to turn off the blocker on Radio Leicester

I cant listen to those blithering idiots on RL so I'll just have to stick to watching 633 Squadron on tv :) Mike Baldwin has just crashed into the rocks :icon_bigg
 
Stop talking out of your arse. Kennedy and Moore have performed very well on loan in the first half of the season. Pelts and Konchesky have been competent but how many goals have we conceded with an unchallenged cross from a flank. I can think of three in the past month

Exactly
 
There is no need to be rude: if City take a point, or lose by the odd goal, then this is a reasonable line up - and I am (not for the first time) wrong. A good hiding, and I think Pearson will deserve criticism.

You were the target for the constant negativity surrounding a lot of people with Pearson. Bottom line is a few injuries and this is our shadow squad. You made out as if Liam Moore and Tom Kennedy are park players, they are professionals with league experiences and at the moment our most competent back up. People have asked for change and this is change. If anything it should be a criticism of Sven, spent big and this is our back up.
 
You were the target for the constant negativity surrounding a lot of people with Pearson. Bottom line is a few injuries and this is our shadow squad. You made out as if Liam Moore and Tom Kennedy are park players, they are professionals with league experiences and at the moment our most competent back up. People have asked for change and this is change. If anything it should be a criticism of Sven, spent big and this is our back up.

We do have Pantsill there as well. Not necessarily saying he should play but he is there and would have thought he was ahead in the pecking order.
 
It's quite amazing, considering the investment in the summer, how patched up we look.

What on Earth went on in the summer?

I'm fed up with people quoting the 'investment' now. We spent 90odd % of the spending on 3 players, all of who are in the squad. The rest were free or next to nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2047
2Arsenal2143
3Nottm F2141
4Newcastle2138
5Chelsea2137
6Manchester C  2135
7Aston Villa2135
8Bournemouth2134
9Brighton2131
10Fulham2130
11Brentford2128
12Manchester U2126
13West Ham2126
14Tottenham 2124
15Palace2124
16Everton2017
17Wolves2116
18Ipswich2116
19Leicester2114
20Southampton216

Latest posts

Back
Top