Brown Nose
Well-Known Member
It's still a big *if*, but if we stay up, I don't understand why DS wouldn't deserve the opportunity to manage us next season.
In many of your posts you refer to a massive rebuild and that relegation is inevitable ("We're a yo-yo club"), and yet in others you detract from a manager who re-built and delivered 45 points a season with an equally mediocre squad.
Just to be clear, 45 points would average 13th in the PL. Is there anyone here that wouldn't accept that next season?!
(And if DS keeps us up, I see no reason why he wouldn't be in a position to deliver that).
Fair challenge.
I base my opinion of what we 'should' achieve on our comparative budget which - last time the figures were published - showed that we paid the 7th highest amount on wages and our revenue was also at that level.
My criticism of Puel was that he was underachieving. I claimed that we had a 60 point squad with a 50 point manager. Under Rodgers I veered to and from wanting him out but he either 'achieved' or 'overachieved' in terms of where we finished in his three full seasons.
In that context, taking on a 45 point a season man is clearly a massive step down. I don't think he's an especially good manager. Were we to stay up and give him the job and he ended next season with us on 45 points, that's a big drop in standards.
However, the reality is that we are in the process of a decline in standards. We've pushed too hard, got burnt, and are now retreating. Our owners and leaders have proved themselves to be less than we'd hoped.
If our summer dealings see us massively reduce the wage bill and fail to reinvest, 45 points would be a perfectly acceptable return. But we can't possibly have been so keen on Potter and the stadium development with that level of ambition.
I guess we'll find out soon enough.