Dean Smith - LCFC Manager

Log in to stop seeing adverts

It's still a big *if*, but if we stay up, I don't understand why DS wouldn't deserve the opportunity to manage us next season.

In many of your posts you refer to a massive rebuild and that relegation is inevitable ("We're a yo-yo club"), and yet in others you detract from a manager who re-built and delivered 45 points a season with an equally mediocre squad.

Just to be clear, 45 points would average 13th in the PL. Is there anyone here that wouldn't accept that next season?!

(And if DS keeps us up, I see no reason why he wouldn't be in a position to deliver that).

Fair challenge.

I base my opinion of what we 'should' achieve on our comparative budget which - last time the figures were published - showed that we paid the 7th highest amount on wages and our revenue was also at that level.

My criticism of Puel was that he was underachieving. I claimed that we had a 60 point squad with a 50 point manager. Under Rodgers I veered to and from wanting him out but he either 'achieved' or 'overachieved' in terms of where we finished in his three full seasons.

In that context, taking on a 45 point a season man is clearly a massive step down. I don't think he's an especially good manager. Were we to stay up and give him the job and he ended next season with us on 45 points, that's a big drop in standards.

However, the reality is that we are in the process of a decline in standards. We've pushed too hard, got burnt, and are now retreating. Our owners and leaders have proved themselves to be less than we'd hoped.

If our summer dealings see us massively reduce the wage bill and fail to reinvest, 45 points would be a perfectly acceptable return. But we can't possibly have been so keen on Potter and the stadium development with that level of ambition.

I guess we'll find out soon enough.
 
However, the reality is that we are in the process of a decline in standards. We've pushed too hard, got burnt, and are now retreating. Our owners and leaders have proved themselves to be less than we'd hoped.

If our summer dealings see us massively reduce the wage bill and fail to reinvest, 45 points would be a perfectly acceptable return. But we can't possibly have been so keen on Potter and the stadium development with that level of ambition.
All fair.

I think as you state, we've seen a decline in standards, and I'd say that we now have a 45-50 point squad at best. Hence why DS may have found his level.

Whilst a good manager can coach a mediocre team into the top 10 (e.g. Brentford, Brighton, even Fulham currently), with the decline of Vardy, Ndidi and all of our full-backs, the loss of Tielemans and the inconsistency of Barnes, we probably only have Maddison that is easily a Top 10 player (let alone top 6 which we were a few seasons ago).
 
He does seem to be a Leicester City type manager. The previous manager NEVER, to me, seemed like a Leicester City type manager. Nige Pearson? yes (most of the time). Claudio? No. Shakespear? Yes. Puel? No.

That's my odd thoughts for today.
 
He does seem to be a Leicester City type manager. The previous manager NEVER, to me, seemed like a Leicester City type manager. Nige Pearson? yes (most of the time). Claudio? No. Shakespear? Yes. Puel? No.

That's my odd thoughts for today.
Well, at least we all get to look forward to an instalment tomorrow in the comfort that there isn’t going to be any more today.
 
Fair play to him so far.

That said, it’s always good to be the person replacing an absolutely incompetent, roundly disliked, boob of a manager.

To be honest, that’s what I’m left with…just how diabolical the last year of Rodgers reign really was. What an absolute fraud. Smith has introduced some sanity and it’s gone a long long way.


Big result on Tuesday and we might just get away with it.
 
Fair play to him so far.

That said, it’s always good to be the person replacing an absolutely incompetent, roundly disliked, boob of a manager.

To be honest, that’s what I’m left with…just how diabolical the last year of Rodgers reign really was. What an absolute fraud. Smith has introduced some sanity and it’s gone a long long way.


Big result on Tuesday and we might just get away with it.

I like the way he speaks and I like the way he seems to have affected the squad positively.

However, **** me, his selection and tactics were dreadful yesterday. It was a right state. He's definitely not the answer if the question is how to improve us next season.
 
I like the way he speaks and I like the way he seems to have affected the squad positively.

However, **** me, his selection and tactics were dreadful yesterday. It was a right state. He's definitely not the answer if the question is how to improve us next season.
Is that true though? We were aggressive from the off and pressed well. We made a ****ing stupid error as usual but that was down to the individual, not the setup. In the second half we did very well in stretching the game and we scored an excellent goal with a terrific move. He made the right subs at the right time and we won. Daka was shit but his pace was stretching their defence.

It was an unusual lineup and not one think he'll necessarily repeat but he had limited resources without Barnes, Ricardo and Maddison.

It's somewhat churlish therefore, to suggest that he got it so wrong when what we saw suggests otherwise. Time will tell.
 
I like the way he speaks and I like the way he seems to have affected the squad positively.

However, **** me, his selection and tactics were dreadful yesterday. It was a right state. He's definitely not the answer if the question is how to improve us next season.
We won right? He can go whatever ducking formation he ****ing wants me f he can keep us up.

Cut your cloth accordingly I believe is the correct expresssion.

FWIW, I don’t believe he planned for that formation but with the late Maddison omission, maybe his hand was forced somewhat?
 
I’d take the ugliest turgid crap if it meant we won and got out of this mess. If we are together as a team we have a chance.
 
We won right? He can go whatever ducking formation he ****ing wants me f he can keep us up.

Cut your cloth accordingly I believe is the correct expresssion.

FWIW, I don’t believe he planned for that formation but with the late Maddison omission, maybe his hand was forced somewhat?
Agreed. Presumably he’d have gone Tete/Iheanacho/Maddison behind Vardy. Yes you could say Maddison’s best position is central, but we had no Barnes.

It ended up looking ridiculous because he had to put Daka in instead of Maddison.
 
To be fair the fella has only known the players five minutes
 
Proper duffer of a selection isn't it?

He's failed in his last two jobs and it's obvious why. He's not up to it.

That's what happens when you leave it until the very last second to make a change of manager. The only other option was big Sam.
 
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top