EFL Trophy Draw

Log in to stop seeing adverts

Status
Not open for further replies.
They can have three overage players, plus an overage goalie.

That's not what the competition rules say.

"Each Invited Club must ensure that in each Match at least 6 of the starting eleven players named on the Team Sheet are players who were aged under 21 as at the 30th June in the year in which the Season concerned commenced. "

Rules here: http://www.efl.com/global/trophyrules.aspx
 
That's not what the competition rules say.

"Each Invited Club must ensure that in each Match at least 6 of the starting eleven players named on the Team Sheet are players who were aged under 21 as at the 30th June in the year in which the Season concerned commenced. "

Rules here: http://www.efl.com/global/trophyrules.aspx


fair enough, I was going on this quote from another article ...

Like the Premier League 2 format - and those Academy sides taking part in this year's English EFL Trophy trial - clubs are able to use a maximum of three overage players, and one overage goalkeeper should they choose.
 
It's the Sheffield United game tonight.

Is anyone interested?
A lot of Sheff U fans will be boycotting the match.



Here's what a journalist in Sheffield thinks about it...

Next week, Sheffield United begin another assault on the Johnstone’s Paint, Checkatrade Trophy or whatever else it’s called these days.

And do you know what? I hope they don’t end up contesting the cup in April. I hope Chris Wilder and his employers treat the competition with the contempt it deserves and select a team of kids who have never played a first team game in their lives and, with all due respect, will probably never make the grade at Bramall Lane.

Because, let’s be frank, that’s what opponents Leicester City are probably planning after this summer’s ridiculous revamp of a tournament already struggling for credibility in the eyes of most lower league fans. In case it has escaped your notice, 16 clubs boasting category one academy status were recently invited to participate following June’s annual EFL conference in Portugal. Most of these are to be found in the Premier League although many potential entrants, Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United included, couldn’t be bothered to accept and politely declined the offer last month. A situation which has been described as everything from “amateur-hour” to a “complete and utter farce.” Given the lack of consultation involved and the obvious undertones, it is difficult to disagree. In the past, I’ve defended the JPT as it used to be known. No club, especially those in the bottom two divisions of English football, should be choosy about winning silverware. Most footballers retire without having ever won a medal which, as Fernando Torres once argued, is the sign of an unfulfilled career. But allowing top-flight sides, coupled with a few chancers from the Championship, to join this already subdued party means that it no longer possible. And not because watching United battle it out with Leicester’s under-23’s fails to float my boat. Rather, as many commentators have pointed-out, this whole sorry business stinks of League Three mission creep. (Consult Supporters Direct if you don’t know what that means).

Hilariously, organisers have decided that a group stage format is the way to go this year. No more two-legged semi-finals to decide who visits Wembley. Those generated some interest. So the paying public is now being given less of what it does want and more of what it doesn’t. A simply inspired idea. Threatening to fine Chris Wilder and his counterparts if they field under-strength squads is also nothing short of insulting. If United could field an academy team too I might, (and I stress might), even be in favour. But, unless they want to be punished financially, they can’t.

Joseph de Maistre said “every nation gets the government it deserves.” I hope the EFL gets the Checkatrade Trophy final it deserves too. Middlesbrough under-23’s versus Reading under-23’s in front of 300 or so disinterested fans.

http://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/foot...umn-what-a-complete-and-utter-farce-1-8089791
 
He makes a point. While it might be good for a club like ours to allow our younger players to get some better experience and more experience you can see why League One and under clubs are not happy about it. Can't see it lasting for very long.
 
Sadly it's a comment on "cups" in the modern era. I remember when winning the FA Cup was as good as winning the league.
 
Sadly it's a comment on "cups" in the modern era. I remember when winning the FA Cup was as good as winning the league.
It genuinely was, too. Cup Final day used to feel special, as a kid. Shame, really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FIF
It genuinely was, too. Cup Final day used to feel special, as a kid. Shame, really.


Third round day was pretty special too. Probably more travelling fans than any other day in the footballing calendar. The motorways were a riot of colour with scarves dragging from car windows and fans trying to guess the identity of fans travelling in the opposite direction from the tint of their trail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FIF
Almost like James Shield, I would like to see the Blades fail to compete in this (or any other) competition this season. And next. And the ones after that.

But then, unlike Shield, I won't be heralding a new dawn tomorrow morning should my side win. Let's see how his contempt fares if they make a fist of it and progress to Wembley.
 
Nerdy question, but is this a 'first team' appearance for the stats of those players involved?
 
Any streams for tonight?

EDIT - My post was a complete joke as well but great timing BN!

EDIT 2 - Bullshit - no pre-mtach build up already!?!
 
I wouldn't have thought so. It's likely to be treated the same way as our development squad games.

It's a great question though as surely it would have to as it is a proper senior tournament, just we are only fielding an U23 team?

For the opposition teams it will be a recorded 'first-team' game so it would have to be for us too.

But then they aren't playing for actual Leicester City first team so it can't be?

Ahh this is such a gray area it's almost black!
 
I bet it's not. Looks like they're claiming to have a stream so you'll click the links in their description where they'll attempt to install malware on your computer.

I don't think any of these games are being televised.

Booooooooo!

I was presuming it was their official YT for some reason as we've had friendlies on there before.

You appear to be correct though :(
 
It's a great question though as surely it would have to as it is a proper senior tournament, just we are only fielding an U23 team?
It's not an under 23 team. Six players have to be under 21.

For the opposition teams it will be a recorded 'first-team' game so it would have to be for us too.

But then they aren't playing for actual Leicester City first team so it can't be?

It's not listed as a first team game on LCFC.com. It's a development squad game. http://www.lcfc.com/fixtures-results/development_squad.aspx
 
It's not an under 23 team. Six players have to be under 21.



It's not listed as a first team game on LCFC.com. It's a development squad game. http://www.lcfc.com/fixtures-results/development_squad.aspx

Come on Jeff, when has the OS been a source of corectness??

The competition they are playing in is a recognised senior tourament though.

Surely one team can't have it recorded as a senior match but not the other?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top