camberwell fox
Well-Known Member
Hopefully they were similar?Your post beat mine by seconds
Hopefully they were similar?Your post beat mine by seconds
Take a look, you twat...Hopefully they were similar?
I agree it is difficult. When you look back though, Maguire was sold and we bought Fofana, Soyuncu and just before hat Benjovic. 2 out of those 3 are brilliant signings.
LB is another case in question, we sold Chilwell ( I know not everyone rated him but Chelsea DID), and we replaced with Castagne and Justin with Thomas in just behind them.
My point is we have a conveyor belt of players coming in for all positions bar 2 and this bodes very well not only as an underpin to our sell 1/development strategy but also to having a much stronger squad (with depth) and competition in all positions.
I firmly believe our model is correct, sustainable and leads to continued success.
I agree with our model. I like the way we do things.I'm not saying it's easy but.....
Kante - Ndidi
Maguire - Soyuncu
Chilwell - JJ
Look at how we've invested the transfer money. Ricardo, Castagne, Maddison, Fofana.
Tilemans or Ndidi won't leave this summer but I bet Leicester will recruit their replacements this summer.
As long as we only sell one top players in the season the squad can cope whilst the replacement gets up to speed, it's like pruning a tree to make it grow back stronger.
I wouldn't want any off our squad to leave (except the obvious ones) but I have faith in Leicester to replace them if they do.
I think 99% of people would leave their current employer if they was offered a 100% pay rise with a competitor, it's human nature.
As @tedfoxxx regularly states, he often looks like he's barely even trying. Mark of a great.I actually think Youri Tielemans is potentially one of the greatest talents in world football. He's a season away from De Bruyne level for me. Silly good.
120 thanks. If Maguire is worth 80...Probably only 3 teams in the premier league that could afford him.
Both Manchester clubs and Chelsea, nobody else will pay the £100 million for him.
Maguire wasn't worth £80 million it's just Utd we're stupid enough to pay it.120 thanks. If Maguire is worth 80...
Yeah but they got Kanté for peanuts, relatively speaking, for a player of that standardChelsea must be gunshy signing our players at this point?
we’ve had their pants down twice.
That was before the market really exploded though wasn't it? We'd easily get double what we got for him if we sold him now.Yeah but they got Kanté for peanuts, relatively speaking, for a player of that standard
When we sold him he was worth a lot more, but he had a clause in his contract that meant we had to accept Chelsea's offer.That was before the market really exploded though wasn't it? We'd easily get double what we got for him if we sold him now.
We would have got more at the time if it wasn't for a release clause.That was before the market really exploded though wasn't it? We'd easily get double what we got for him if we sold him now.
just beat me to it.When we sold him he was worth a lot more, but he had a clause in his contract that meant we had to accept Chelsea's offer.
Ah you're right, I remember being annoyed we put such a small one in.We would have got more at the time if it wasn't for a release clause.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 17 | 42 |
2 | Arsenal | 18 | 36 |
3 | Chelsea | 18 | 35 |
4 | Nottm F | 18 | 34 |
5 | Newcastle | 18 | 29 |
6 | Bournemouth | 18 | 29 |
7 | Manchester C | 18 | 28 |
8 | Fulham | 18 | 28 |
9 | Aston Villa | 18 | 28 |
10 | Brighton | 18 | 26 |
11 | Brentford | 18 | 24 |
12 | Tottenham | 18 | 23 |
13 | West Ham | 18 | 23 |
14 | Manchester U | 18 | 22 |
15 | Everton | 17 | 17 |
16 | Palace | 18 | 17 |
17 | Wolves | 18 | 15 |
18 | Leicester | 18 | 14 |
19 | Ipswich | 18 | 12 |
20 | Southampton | 18 | 6 |