Excusing the inexcusable

[Blue Maniac]

Oh you're funny. Prick

I'm not getting involved :icon_redf

 

[Longcliffe]

I'm not getting involved :icon_redf

You're still a prick.

 

[beaumontfox]

Yes, yes he is.

 

[Longcliffe]

Yes, yes he is.

Thank you for confirming that.

 

[Blue Maniac]

You're still a prick.

Not my fault you got your sentence in the wrong order. It was confusing.

 

[Blue Maniac]

Thank you for confirming that.

:icon_bigg

 

[Longcliffe]

Not my fault you got your sentence in the wrong order. It was confusing.

Could confuse a stupid person.
I'm just glad you find yourself funny.

 

[spionfox]

Could confuse a stupid person.
I'm just glad you find yourself funny.

Do you actually know what you wrote and why BM (and others, myself included) would find it confusing?

 

[Blue Maniac]

Could confuse a stupid person.
I'm just glad you find yourself funny.

You seem to have understood it perfectly well. Stick to your stupid, unfunny, racist jokes if you can't communicate effectively.

 

[beaumontfox]

Thank you for confirming that.

I wasn't confirming it in the way you want it confirming.

 

[Longcliffe]

You seem to have understood it perfectly well. Stick to your stupid, unfunny, racist jokes if you can't communicate effectively.

I couldn't give care less what you think. You are talking total bollocks as usual and act like a pathetic schoolboy.

 

[Blue Maniac]

I couldn't give care less what you think. You are talking total bollocks as usual and act like a pathetic schoolboy.

Have you got evidence of me doing these things, now or ever?

 

[Longcliffe]

Have you got evidence of me doing these things, now or ever?

In this post today for starters. If it's your ambition to nit-pick through people's posts, go ahead.

 

[Blue Maniac]

In this post today for starters. If it's your ambition to nit-pick through people's posts, go ahead.

Explain or **** off.

 

[beaumontfox]

oh ffs!!

longcliffe: your post reads as if the FATHER of the child killed was given 5 years.

 

[Blue Maniac]

oh ffs!!

longcliffe: your post reads as if the FATHER of the child killed was given 5 years.

Which explains why I was confused. I thought he'd left out part of the story

 

[Longcliffe]

Explain or **** off.

I try to explain what had happened to my mate's son and that he had been killed. Also how the killer is probably going to be out after about 14 months. Sorry I typed it quickly and I may have not got everything precise.
You then reply with a stupid and inane comment and you do not actually add anything to the post.
Perhaps you are just happy acting like an arsehole.
Go **** yourself, prick.

 

[Blue Maniac]

I try to explain what had happened to my mate's son and that he had been killed. Also how the killer is probably going to be out after about 14 months. Sorry I typed it quickly and I may have not got everything precise.
You then reply with a stupid and inane comment and you do not actually add anything to the post.
Perhaps you are just happy acting like an arsehole.
Go **** yourself, prick.

**** me, what an outrageous overreaction. This is going nowhere, so I'm out.

 

[spionfox]

oh ffs!!

longcliffe: your post reads as if the FATHER of the child killed was given 5 years.

Do you actually know what you wrote and why BM (and others, myself included) would find it confusing?

I tried to give him a clue.

 

[Longcliffe]

oh ffs!!

longcliffe: your post reads as if the FATHER of the child killed was given 5 years.

Where does it say anything about the FATHER killing his son?