Fao Foxes Trust

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
The FT will usually respond to questions around 2300hrs - 2400hrs, I can't decide if this is the only time they are available or the only time they know they won't get into a mass debate with questions and abuse flying all over the place
 
The FT will usually respond to questions around 2300hrs - 2400hrs, I can't decide if this is the only time they are available or the only time they know they won't get into a mass debate with questions and abuse flying all over the place

You look nothing more than to mass debate don't you MF ?
 
The FT will usually respond to questions around 2300hrs - 2400hrs, I can't decide if this is the only time they are available or the only time they know they won't get into a mass debate with questions and abuse flying all over the place

They spread their time looking at all the LCFC message boards, so we only get part of the available time, and they have to fit it in with life/job etc. If they weren't interested in taking part they wouldn't bother coming here at all.
 
They spread their time looking at all the LCFC message boards, so we only get part of the available time, and they have to fit it in with life/job etc. If they weren't interested in taking part they wouldn't bother coming here at all.

And the amount of grief they get they have some bollox if nothing else
 
They spread their time looking at all the LCFC message boards, so we only get part of the available time, and they have to fit it in with life/job etc. If they weren't interested in taking part they wouldn't bother coming here at all.
I was defending them
 
They spread their time looking at all the LCFC message boards, so we only get part of the available time, and they have to fit it in with life/job etc. If they weren't interested in taking part they wouldn't bother coming here at all.

The FT get alot of abuse on here, i think its quite commendable that they keep coming back despite of it. Whether anyone likes the answers they give or not, they do keep coming up with them. It is possible that they may attend the odd game so could be travelling to sunderland at the moment!!
 
The FT get alot of abuse on here, i think its quite commendable that they keep coming back despite of it. Whether anyone likes the answers they give or not, they do keep coming up with them.

My sentiments exactly,i don't agree with a lot they say and think most of it is just spiel but they at least have the backbone to face the music as it were.
 
They spread their time looking at all the LCFC message boards, so we only get part of the available time, and they have to fit it in with life/job etc. If they weren't interested in taking part they wouldn't bother coming here at all.
I would have thought it was not down to one person to see what the forums have to say, I would say there are several of them posting under the FT banner...
 
They haven't been on the site since then.

If you want to get their attention why don't you email them?


might be best, but I would have liked them to answer this question on here
 
Well we have just signed on & seen this thread, so will do a quick post before having some sleep.

We are always honest so....

We don't know the answer, we don't get a breakdown of profit/loss on each game.

Our Observer at LCFC Board Meetings & our rep on the LCFC Audit Committee get to see some detailed financial packs, but they don't analyse profit/loss match by match, only attendance against budget are noted for League games.

So we would have to ask the club, but may not be provided with the details or they may provide them but state we can't go public on them

In the greater scheme of things the question is irrelevant anyway, of far more concern is the attendance figures for league games this season
 
I think their was profit, clubs make profits on much lower attendances and bear in mind each person paid for their ticket whilst on league games sth provide no matchday revenue so the amount of revenue isnt huge for them either.
 
Last edited:
So we would have to ask the club, but may not be provided with the details or they may provide them but state we can't go public on them

In the greater scheme of things the question is irrelevant anyway, of far more concern is the attendance figures for league games this season

What would the club have to hide by not going public, it would not make any sense, unless they have something to hide.:102:

And the second point is very relevant, did they or did they not make a loss from it?
The club would know game by game how much money they took and how much money went out, so this game would be no different.
 
What would the club have to hide by not going public, it would not make any sense, unless they have something to hide.:102:

And the second point is very relevant, did they or did they not make a loss from it?
The club would know game by game how much money they took and how much money went out, so this game would be no different.

Leicester are run as a commercial organisation, and I would regard such information as confidential, plus Macclesfield may not want this information publicised. You are a customer of the club, does that allow you to ask for financial figures whenever you want? When I bought my Sunday papers today I didn't feel I had the right to ask my newagent what money he made last week. Unlike my newsagent, however, the club's annual accounts are available for whoever wants to see them.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Chelsea2240
5Manchester C  2238
6Newcastle2238
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2216
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226
Back
Top