FAO Vista Ultimate Users

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
No. You have an illegal copy of Vista which may already be compromised and which at some time you probably won't be able to download updates to. Either way, it may not be the bargain that you presumed.

You've already told us that you have failed exams recently because you didn't study properly. Perhaps you would be better to concentrate on that rather than playing up to your dodgy mate.

Do i care about updates?

There will be ways :023:

Failed exams:102::102::tumbleweed:
 
I haven't got a dodgy Vista; already had mine on my laptop, couldn't even use an Ipod how the **** was I meant to download this software thingy :102: I was just humouring Fludie hence my use of, "lol"s and facial expressions.


In that case, I apologise. The post which you made at 06:19 p.m. yesterday, being amongst Fludie's talk about his 'cracked Vista', seemed to suggest that you too had such a copy. I am sure that others also gained this impression.
 
Failed exams:102::102::tumbleweed:

That was addressed to Tamworth, not to you.

I've got to say that I would care not a jot whether you had failed any exams or not. You seem intent on wasting the opportunities that your education has afforded you, whilst until recently Tamworth seems to have been making the most of himself. The two things may not be entirely unconnected.
 
In all seriousness, I haven't got an "illegal," copy of Vista. I've got Vista on my laptop but that was on It when I purchased the laptop; actually my Dad bought it for my 18th.
 
Wasn't there a huge argument elsewhere a while back because someone posted a picture of someone else with their place of work in the background, and we decided not to post peoples work details? I think it involved Lazzer but I could be very much mistaken
 
Wasn't there a huge argument elsewhere a while back because someone posted a picture of someone else with their place of work in the background, and we decided not to post peoples work details? I think it involved Lazzer but I could be very much mistaken

Not a contridiction from a moderator is it, one rule for them another for another :102:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1639
2Chelsea1735
3Arsenal1733
4Nottm F1731
5Bournemouth1728
6Aston Villa1728
7Manchester C  1727
8Newcastle1726
9Fulham1725
10Brighton1725
11Tottenham 1723
12Brentford1723
13Manchester U1722
14West Ham1720
15Everton1616
16Palace1716
17Leicester1714
18Wolves1712
19Ipswich1712
20Southampton176

Latest posts

Back
Top