Football Rumours

[highland fox]

I dont buy that. The "normal" poster on here cannot issue warnings can they?

But does it really fecking matter,only webbo can ban people.Steven,Lazzer,Durham whoever can issue as many fecking warnings as they like but they mean nothing,its webbo who is the Top Bollox and does the Banning

 

[Durham Fox]

Perhaps normally it wouldn't but people go through personal probs etc which can effect how they react to piss taking

Maybe so but you can hardly account for that when you are dealing with people you dont know!! People have no idea what frame of mind others are in. If you played it safe because of this it would be a very dull place IMO.

 

[Jeff]

My reply to his infraction was "wanker"

And his reply was "Feel better now do we."


You replied to this, something about abuse of power.

Steven hasn't replied since.



This promted you to write

"Steven is carrying this on via PM's................."



So what exactly made you think he's "carrying this on by pms"?
His lack of abusive reply to you?

Did you really think you could post saying he was carrying it on by PM without me chEcking to see what was going on?


Initially I thought Steven was over-reacting to what seems to have been a harmless joke, but the response of some people since then has been ridiculous and over the top.

 

[highland fox]

Maybe so but you can hardly account for that when you are dealing with people you dont know!! People have no idea what frame of mind others are in. If you played it safe because of this it would be a very dull place IMO.

But if the person's first post isn't one of them laughing at the joke aimed at them etc maybe its best not to carry it on

 

[Steven]

Steven is carrying this on via PM's.................:icon_roll

Re: You have received an infraction at Talking Balls

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven
Dear Boy Genius,

You have received an infraction at Talking Balls.

Reason: Inappropriate Language
-------
Not funny to agree with someone abusing another forum member
-------

This infraction is worth 1 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire.

Original Post:


http://www.talkingballs.co.uk/showthread.php?p=489874

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by drummindefender
can we conclude from this poll then that steven is in fact a ****




All the best,
Talking Balls

wanker

You were the first to send a PM in which you abused me again, see the above quote.

 

[Durham Fox]

But if the person's first post isn't one of them laughing at the joke aimed at them etc maybe its best not to carry it on

Agreed! :icon_bigg

 

[highland fox]

Agreed! :icon_bigg

Finally:icon_wink

 

[Boy Genius]

You were the first to send a PM in which you abused me again, see the above quote.

if you had not been such a prat and sent the thing in the first place, I would not have replied back "wanker" would I.

If you are as timid and sensative as you make out, wouldn't a PM outlining your problem have been the best bet, rather than getting peoples backs up by sending that crap?
I would have thought most people would have done that rather than bull at a gate method


Now if you dont mind end it and end it now......

 

[Steven]

if you had not been such a prat and sent the thing in the first place, I would not have replied back "wanker" would I.

If you are as timid and sensative as you make out, wouldn't a PM outlining your problem have been the best bet, rather than getting peoples backs up by sending that crap?
I would have thought most people would have done that rather than bull at a gate method


Now if you dont mind end it and end it now......

I didn't start this so how can I end it?

 

[homer]

Now if you dont mind end it and end it now......

Let's just settle it once and for all the old fashioned way........

http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=****&word2=wanker

 

[Jeff]

I didn't start this so how can I end it?

You can allow BG to apologise to you for calling you names and accusing you of doing stuff you didn't do.

 

[Boy Genius]

I didn't start this so how can I end it?

I could tell you, but you would only cry

 

[Boy Genius]

You can allow BG to apologise to you for calling you names and accusing you of doing stuff you didn't do.

or he could apologise to the 3 of us for abuse of power....:icon_wink

 

[Jeff]

or he could apologise to the 3 of us for abuse of power....:icon_wink

Would you have preferred it if he'd deleted your posts instead, rather than just send you a warning?

 

[highland fox]

Fecking pair of Jessies...you are worse than that Soft Tosser who won't post on the LCFC Forum anymore

 

[Jeff]

Fecking pair of Jessies...you are worse than that Soft Tosser who won't post on the LCFC Forum anymore

That's a very offensive word to some people. I think I might have to ban you from every part of the site apart from the LCFC forum.

 

[highland fox]

That's a very offensive word to some people. I think I might have to ban you from every part of the site apart from the LCFC forum.

Pissflaps

 

[Steven]

You can allow BG to apologise to you for calling you names and accusing you of doing stuff you didn't do.

That would be acceptable. However the biggest villan in this piece is DD who started this off not BG for continuing it.

Why can no-one understand how I feel when somebody calls me a c**t for posting rumours from a website. Am I supposed to start singing "O what a beautiful morning ..." when I read something like that? Where is the "joke", where is the "banter"? I cannot see it.

 

[homer]

It's OK - I've just found out that they have both made a formal request for some mediation and counselling.....

 

[Macky]

It's OK - I've just found out that they have both made a formal request for some mediation and counselling.....

Look like a right pair of ****s if you ask me.