Do Norwich really see James Vaughan as a better player than Grant Holt? If so it's going to be a painful season for them I reckon
They might still have other targets. They're a week behind us.
Holt for me won't cut it in the Prem, but he's proved he's good enough in our league. £2m is a reasonable price, and will see Norwich make a decent return of approx £1.6m on the guy that fired them in to the Prem.
I don't understand why he would come back to the Championship when he's already a Premiership player with Norwich?
Just like Mills who reportedly turned down Prem clubs to sign for us?
V. disappointing, if true (which I'm sure it isn't)
Really? This guy was unstoppable in this division last year.
"Foxes’ boss Sven-Goran Eriksson has moved for Holt after losing out on Republic of Ireland ace Shane Long
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-sell-Grant-Holt-Leicester.html#ixzz1U4OQa4Vs"
The same Sven who has just said about 10 minutes ago that the deal for Long is one we are unlikely to see completed by the weekend but is still a possibility?
I watched that intrerview and he never confirmed we had put a bid for Long.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Leicester | 46 | 97 |
2 | Ipswich | 46 | 96 |
3 | Leeds Utd | 46 | 90 |
4 | Southampton | 46 | 87 |
5 | West Brom | 46 | 75 |
6 | Norwich City | 46 | 73 |
7 | Hull City | 46 | 70 |
8 | Middlesbro | 46 | 69 |
9 | Coventry City | 46 | 64 |
10 | Preston | 46 | 63 |
11 | Bristol City | 46 | 62 |
12 | Cardiff City | 46 | 62 |
13 | Millwall | 46 | 59 |
14 | Swansea City | 46 | 57 |
15 | Watford | 46 | 56 |
16 | Sunderland | 46 | 56 |
17 | Stoke City | 46 | 56 |
18 | QPR | 46 | 56 |
19 | Blackburn | 46 | 53 |
20 | Sheffield W | 46 | 53 |
21 | Plymouth | 46 | 51 |
22 | Birmingham | 46 | 50 |
23 | Huddersfield | 46 | 45 |
24 | Rotherham Utd | 46 | 27 |