Ignore thread feature

[spionfox]

I know this was asked before Jeff, but any chance of the 'ignore thread' feature ever working again?

 

[Cate Fox]

I know this was asked before Jeff, but any chance of the 'ignore thread' feature ever working again?

It does - click on "thread tools" at the top of the thread.

 

[From Gradel to Grave]

It doesn't work on the new post search but it does in the individual forums.

 

[spionfox]

It doesn't work on the new post search but it does in the individual forums.

Correct. That's the way I use the forum so that's the way I wish it would work.

 

[bocadillo]

Correct. That's the way I use the forum so that's the way I wish it would work.

Surely though you don't know that you want to ignore a thread until you've seen at least one of its posts? You could therefore set it to ignore from within the thread, i.e. by going to 'thread tools' at the top of the thread.

 

[Blue Maniac]

Surely though you don't know that you want to ignore a thread until you've seen at least one of its posts? You could therefore set it to ignore from within the thread, i.e. by going to 'thread tools' at the top of the thread.

I don't think that's what he means.

 

[spionfox]

Surely though you don't know that you want to ignore a thread until you've seen at least one of its posts? You could therefore set it to ignore from within the thread, i.e. by going to 'thread tools' at the top of the thread.

I always read at least one post in the thread but then can't ignore as you say using the thread tools. Something about reading in unread posts view as previously mentioned.

 

[bocadillo]

I always read at least one post in the thread but then can't ignore as you say using the thread tools. Something about reading in unread posts view as previously mentioned.

OK - I've just ignored this thread and it has disappeared from the index. Do you mean that when the next post is made, it will still appear in the list of unread posts?

 

[spionfox]

OK - I've just ignored this thread and it has disappeared from the index. Do you mean that when the next post is made, it will still appear in the list of unread posts?

Because I view by new posts, yes!

 

[Jeff]

I explained all this when I installed the ignore thread feature last year. There's a thread about it somewhere, you should be able to find it if you've not got it on ignore...

 

[spionfox]

I explained all this when I installed the ignore thread feature last year. There's a thread about it somewhere, you should be able to find it if you've not got it on ignore...

I know you did Jeff, I admitted as much in the opening post. Just wanted to know if anything would ever be done about it was all ;-)

 

[bocadillo]

Because I view by new posts, yes!

Yup - I see that now. You're ****ed!!

 

[spionfox]

Yup - I see that now. You're ****ed!!

I wish

 

[pork pie fox]

I think it may have been me who mentioned this before. I use the "New Posts" button to navigate the site, so this still didn't let me escape Spion's musical tastes even though I put the thread on ignore.

 

[Jeff]

I think it may have been me who mentioned this before. I use the "New Posts" button to navigate the site, so this still didn't let me escape Spion's musical tastes even though I put the thread on ignore.

Just ignore Spion instead.

 

[spionfox]

Just ignore Spion instead.

Can I call the forum owner a **** without being infracted? Just want to check before doing so :icon_bigg

 

[Mawsley]

Can I call the forum owner a **** without being infracted? Just want to check before doing so :icon_bigg

I think you could type "Jeff is a ****" if Jeff happened to be the pet name for Mrs Spion's boss box, but seeing as she refers to it as "Mawsley's Mess Bucket" then writing "Jeff is a ****" would only be viewed as abusive and liable for an infraction.

In my opinion.

 

[spionfox]

I think you could type "Jeff is a ****" if Jeff happened to be the pet name for Mrs Spion's boss box, but seeing as she refers to it as "Mawsley's Mess Bucket" then writing "Jeff is a ****" would only be viewed as abusive and liable for an infraction.

In my opinion.

《Mrs Brown》
That's nice
《/Mrs Brown》

 

[Blue Maniac]

I think you could type "Jeff is a ****" if Jeff happened to be the pet name for Mrs Spion's boss box, but seeing as she refers to it as "Mawsley's Mess Bucket" then writing "Jeff is a ****" would only be viewed as abusive and liable for an infraction.

In my opinion.

Do we know of any famous Jeffs who are ****s?

 

[The Major]

Do we know of any famous Jeffs who are ****s?

Funny you should ask, that's my pet name for the wife's fanny.