New Contract Jannik Vestergaard

[Rock Fox]

Gives us a chance to sell on for some sort of return if he does well over the next 2 years.

I'm just guessing but - giving Jannik a 3 year contract means we could sell him even before this season starts and we'd still get some cash in - rather than just letting him go on a 'free' now.

 

[give_us_a_wave]

I'm just guessing but - giving Jannik a 3 year contract means we could sell him even before this season starts and we'd still get some cash in - rather than just letting him go on a 'free' now.

Technically yes. But not likely. Unless some world class CB suddenly declares himself a lifelong City fan & wants to come here for a massive pay cut to help us rejuvenate ourselves.

Still, at some point we could always do what we normally do I suppose & sell him to Man U or Chelsea.

 

[M17TT C]

Honestly laughable that anyone thinks any team is going to pay a substantial fee for big Jan.

If we are that ****ed for FFP we will probably sign Fatawu and then sell him on again for double what we paid.

 

[FOX Franks]

Honestly laughable that anyone thinks any team is going to pay a substantial fee for big Jan.

If we are that ****ed for FFP we will probably sign Fatawu and then sell him on again for double what we paid.

We would

 

[big_mac4824]

****ing ludicrous decision he has the pace of an astmatic sloth, combined with the turning circle of the QE2, but at least he can pass a football!

 

[popillius]

****ing ludicrous decision he has the pace of an astmatic sloth, combined with the turning circle of the QE2, but at least he can pass a football!

I mean, it's a perfectly sensible decision. He's a decent enough defender who, in the right setup, has already proven he can be perfectly adequate albeit not spectacular, in the Premier League.

Would you have preferred no CB, because that's probably the choice given our shackles?