But did it not help the decline of that team in the short-term? I mean, Shilton was a 16 year old kid having to come in for one of the best goalkeeper's in the world at that time. Very difficult to live up to that when you're so young. In terms of the long-term, Leicester have never reached the same heights as they did in the early 60s, since, so was it really that helpful? Shilton also left Leicester at the same time as Banks' retirement so it didn't really work out to be that much of a long-term solution, did it? Or do you think Shilton would've stayed had Banks not got into the accident and Stoke needed to sign him as a replacement.
Interesting to know the views of the fans old enough who were around at that time, but my dad always reckons selling Banks was a mistake.