bocadillo
Water Gypsy
Jeff said:There were reports that Wigan deliberately made their pitch crap by using a roller on it when they whouldn't.
When they whouldn't what?
Jeff said:There were reports that Wigan deliberately made their pitch crap by using a roller on it when they whouldn't.
bocadillo said:When they whouldn't what?
Jeff said:You know shat I mean!
Darth Vodka said:perhaps it worked at reading because it's further south and gets more sun, or it has better light in the stadium
i say groundshare, we're a business, we need money, they've got it
it'll never happen, all the tigers' board do is flirt with groundshare every time the city council dithers on approving entension planning permission
fitz said:if crap pitches are anything to go by when in relation to your team then they obviously do the trick if reading and wigan are examples
newtonfox said:ive just sorted this out :icon_bigg :icon_bigg what they should do is share with us for 12 months while they rebuild welford road ground then ferk off back there
sorted
plus helps us out too
:icon_lol:
Boy Genius said:I've sorted it out too.......... just let them feck off and sort themselves out like we had to do...:icon_bigg
lako42 said:too fecking right. i hate this bollox, just because they are from leicester. they are feck all to do with us there is no relation what so ever, so to me its like sharing with derby or cov or forest. just another team who dont belong here. sod off get your own ground so i dont have to type this every few months you egg chsing nancy boys.
1966 said:This whole issue comes down to one question for me. Do we want to be successfull or not?
If we do not groundshare or attract major investment from somewhere then IMO we will not be successfull.
I for one am willing to take a risk with the groundshare if it provides us with a better chance of success. I do not want to watch cr@p football for years and years, and I think more and more will walk away the longer we spend at this level.
1966 said:This whole issue comes down to one question for me. Do we want to be successfull or not?
If we do not groundshare or attract major investment from somewhere then IMO we will not be successfull.
I for one am willing to take a risk with the groundshare if it provides us with a better chance of success. I do not want to watch cr@p football for years and years, and I think more and more will walk away the longer we spend at this level.
bocadillo said:It depends how you want to measure success. Many see the sharing of the ground as the ultimate failure.
Boy Genius said:selling our soul no less...............
Top question Feriol. You should start an independant thread on that and open it up to us allFeriol said:what state would the club need to be in financially for you to accept he idea?
Feriol said:i don't believe it is so important, so i am against the idea.
but in what state would the club need to be in financially for you to accept he idea?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
5 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
6 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |