LCFC Chairman on Ground Sharing

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jeff said:
There were reports that Wigan deliberately made their pitch crap by using a roller on it when they whouldn't.

When they whouldn't what?
 
if crap pitches are anything to go by when in relation to your team then they obviously do the trick if reading and wigan are examples
 
Last edited:
perhaps it worked at reading because it's further south and gets more sun, or it has better light in the stadium

i say groundshare, we're a business, we need money, they've got it

it'll never happen, all the tigers' board do is flirt with groundshare every time the city council dithers on approving entension planning permission
 
Darth Vodka said:
perhaps it worked at reading because it's further south and gets more sun, or it has better light in the stadium

i say groundshare, we're a business, we need money, they've got it

it'll never happen, all the tigers' board do is flirt with groundshare every time the city council dithers on approving entension planning permission

I say feck em................ why not ask the cricket and basketball teams as well then
 
fitz said:
if crap pitches are anything to go by when in relation to your team then they obviously do the trick if reading and wigan are examples


And Watford...
 
newtonfox said:
ive just sorted this out :icon_bigg :icon_bigg what they should do is share with us for 12 months while they rebuild welford road ground then ferk off back there ;)
sorted

plus helps us out too

:icon_lol: ;)

I've sorted it out too.......... just let them feck off and sort themselves out like we had to do...:icon_bigg
 
Boy Genius said:
I've sorted it out too.......... just let them feck off and sort themselves out like we had to do...:icon_bigg

too fecking right. i hate this bollox, just because they are from leicester. they are feck all to do with us there is no relation what so ever, so to me its like sharing with derby or cov or forest. just another team who dont belong here. sod off get your own ground so i dont have to type this every few months you egg chsing nancy boys.
 
lako42 said:
too fecking right. i hate this bollox, just because they are from leicester. they are feck all to do with us there is no relation what so ever, so to me its like sharing with derby or cov or forest. just another team who dont belong here. sod off get your own ground so i dont have to type this every few months you egg chsing nancy boys.


too right Lako..... too right......
15_10_5.gif
 
whatever just because no one will play bum sports with you
 
This whole issue comes down to one question for me. Do we want to be successfull or not?

If we do not groundshare or attract major investment from somewhere then IMO we will not be successfull.

I for one am willing to take a risk with the groundshare if it provides us with a better chance of success. I do not want to watch cr@p football for years and years, and I think more and more will walk away the longer we spend at this level.
 
1966 said:
This whole issue comes down to one question for me. Do we want to be successfull or not?

If we do not groundshare or attract major investment from somewhere then IMO we will not be successfull.

I for one am willing to take a risk with the groundshare if it provides us with a better chance of success. I do not want to watch cr@p football for years and years, and I think more and more will walk away the longer we spend at this level.

Always look on the black side of life, as do a lot of city fans.... please show me the proof where success will flow once we groundshare? Its all talk. We have lasted long enough without ground sharing and done very well thank you. Here is to another 120 years.....
 
1966 said:
This whole issue comes down to one question for me. Do we want to be successfull or not?

If we do not groundshare or attract major investment from somewhere then IMO we will not be successfull.

I for one am willing to take a risk with the groundshare if it provides us with a better chance of success. I do not want to watch cr@p football for years and years, and I think more and more will walk away the longer we spend at this level.

It depends how you want to measure success. Many see the sharing of the ground as the ultimate failure.
 
bocadillo said:
It depends how you want to measure success. Many see the sharing of the ground as the ultimate failure.

selling our soul no less...............
 
Boy Genius said:
selling our soul no less...............

i don't believe it is so important, so i am against the idea.

but in what state would the club need to be in financially for you to accept he idea?
 
Feriol said:
what state would the club need to be in financially for you to accept he idea?
Top question Feriol. You should start an independant thread on that and open it up to us all

Great question
 
Feriol said:
i don't believe it is so important, so i am against the idea.

but in what state would the club need to be in financially for you to accept he idea?

I wouldn't accept it. If we were in so much shit we had to accept, then I am afraid the money gained would be gobbled up quick somewhere as we fell into the shitter.
Also if it ever came to the point where somebody wanted to buy us, I believe if we ground shared this would not happen as things would be too complicated.
No Tigers feck off, chase eggs on welford Road, but not the Walkers. Its unlucky for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Manchester C  2238
5Newcastle2238
6Chelsea2137
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2116
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226

Latest posts

Back
Top