LCFC Chairman on Ground Sharing

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Status
Not open for further replies.
Melton Fox said:
Top question Feriol. You should start an independant thread on that and open it up to us all

Great question

creep.............:icon_razz
 
Boy Genius said:
We have lasted long enough without ground sharing and done very well thank you. Here is to another 120 years.....

Warning: Clubs can go down as well as up. Past performance is no guide to the future. :icon_bigg
 
LeeH said:
I don't like it because it's a short term solution to a long term problem.

any solution is better than no solution

:(
 
Darth Vodka said:
any solution is better than no solution

:(

Only if sharing the ground solves something/everything can it be called a solution - and there's no guarantee of that.
 
The only time I would choose to have a heart transplant is if I was 100% going to die. If medication solved the problem, and in the long term, improved my health, then I would always opt for that
 
Boy Genius said:
Always look on the black side of life, as do a lot of city fans.... please show me the proof where success will flow once we groundshare? Its all talk. We have lasted long enough without ground sharing and done very well thank you. Here is to another 120 years.....

Over the majority of the last 120 years football was a true sport and as such a wide variety of clubs had their fair share of success, us included, football however is now a business and as such is far more dependent upon money than ever before.

Groundshare is simply an option to generate more cash for the football club (£8m?) and provide us with a better platform from which to compete. If anyone knows of somewhere else we can get this sort of investment then great, but this looks the ONLY option to me.
 
bocadillo said:
It depends how you want to measure success. Many see the sharing of the ground as the ultimate failure.

Success is measured on a Sunday morning in the results and tables section.
 
like somebody said earlier its pointless as it wont happen and with both camps saying it could make us /break us without considering the other point of view its a futile debate .
 
1966 said:
Over the majority of the last 120 years football was a true sport and as such a wide variety of clubs had their fair share of success, us included, football however is now a business and as such is far more dependent upon money than ever before.

Groundshare is simply an option to generate more cash for the football club (£8m?) and provide us with a better platform from which to compete. If anyone knows of somewhere else we can get this sort of investment then great, but this looks the ONLY option to me.


£8 is a paltry sum, to give away half your stadium.

FFS the ground took £32m to build, we paid the thick end of £16m, so in effect you would give tigers a half share for a 1/4 of what it cost to build. They had to buy the land and decontaminate it which cost £7m.
Also I would like to know who will build a stadium our size these days for £16m
Nah feck 'em, and it aint gonna happen anyway.
 
1966 said:
Over the majority of the last 120 years football was a true sport and as such a wide variety of clubs had their fair share of success, us included, football however is now a business and as such is far more dependent upon money than ever before.

Groundshare is simply an option to generate more cash for the football club (£8m?) and provide us with a better platform from which to compete. If anyone knows of somewhere else we can get this sort of investment then great, but this looks the ONLY option to me.


£8 is a paltry sum, to give away half your stadium.

FFS the ground took £32m to build, we paid the thick end of £16m, so in effect you would give tigers a half share for a 1/4 of what it cost to build. They had to buy the land and decontaminate it which cost £7m.
Also I would like to know who will build a stadium our size these days for £16m
Nah feck 'em, and it aint gonna happen anyway.
 
feck me, my post was so good the system posted it twice..........:038: :038:
 
Boy Genius said:
£8 is a paltry sum, to give away half your stadium.

FFS the ground took £32m to build, we paid the thick end of £16m, so in effect you would give tigers a half share for a 1/4 of what it cost to build. They had to buy the land and decontaminate it which cost £7m.
Also I would like to know who will build a stadium our size these days for £16m
Nah feck 'em, and it aint gonna happen anyway.
It's not ours
 
is that cos your with the Woolwich?
 
Boy Genius said:
:038: :038: :038:

I have always been fully against ground sharing and nothing I have read will change my mind. As I have stated on here before, I doubt very much if it will ever happen, and that if it ever did ( god forbid ) it would become "The Walkers Stadium, home to the Tigers and also to lcfc "


I say feck 'em.....:icon_evil

So do I, piss off egg chasing tossers.:icon_evil
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2150
2Arsenal2244
3Nottm F2244
4Manchester C  2238
5Newcastle2238
6Chelsea2137
7Bournemouth2237
8Aston Villa2236
9Brighton2234
10Fulham2233
11Brentford2228
12Palace2227
13Manchester U2226
14West Ham2226
15Tottenham 2224
16Everton2120
17Wolves2116
18Ipswich2216
19Leicester2214
20Southampton226

Latest posts

Back
Top