Boy Genius
Banned
Melton Fox said:Top question Feriol. You should start an independant thread on that and open it up to us all
Great question
creep.............:icon_razz
Melton Fox said:Top question Feriol. You should start an independant thread on that and open it up to us all
Great question
Boy Genius said:We have lasted long enough without ground sharing and done very well thank you. Here is to another 120 years.....
I don't like it because it's a short term solution to a long term problem.Real Sharapova said:I know for emotional reasons some don't like it
LeeH said:I don't like it because it's a short term solution to a long term problem.
Darth Vodka said:any solution is better than no solution
Boy Genius said:Always look on the black side of life, as do a lot of city fans.... please show me the proof where success will flow once we groundshare? Its all talk. We have lasted long enough without ground sharing and done very well thank you. Here is to another 120 years.....
bocadillo said:It depends how you want to measure success. Many see the sharing of the ground as the ultimate failure.
1966 said:Over the majority of the last 120 years football was a true sport and as such a wide variety of clubs had their fair share of success, us included, football however is now a business and as such is far more dependent upon money than ever before.
Groundshare is simply an option to generate more cash for the football club (£8m?) and provide us with a better platform from which to compete. If anyone knows of somewhere else we can get this sort of investment then great, but this looks the ONLY option to me.
1966 said:Over the majority of the last 120 years football was a true sport and as such a wide variety of clubs had their fair share of success, us included, football however is now a business and as such is far more dependent upon money than ever before.
Groundshare is simply an option to generate more cash for the football club (£8m?) and provide us with a better platform from which to compete. If anyone knows of somewhere else we can get this sort of investment then great, but this looks the ONLY option to me.
It's not oursBoy Genius said:£8 is a paltry sum, to give away half your stadium.
FFS the ground took £32m to build, we paid the thick end of £16m, so in effect you would give tigers a half share for a 1/4 of what it cost to build. They had to buy the land and decontaminate it which cost £7m.
Also I would like to know who will build a stadium our size these days for £16m
Nah feck 'em, and it aint gonna happen anyway.
Nathan said:It's not ours
Neither's my house technically, but I don't say it belongs to the Nationwide.Nathan said:It's not ours
Du-dum-ching!OldGit said:is that cos your with the Woolwich?
OldGit said:is that cos your with the Woolwich?
Boy Genius said:
I have always been fully against ground sharing and nothing I have read will change my mind. As I have stated on here before, I doubt very much if it will ever happen, and that if it ever did ( god forbid ) it would become "The Walkers Stadium, home to the Tigers and also to lcfc "
I say feck 'em.....:icon_evil
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 21 | 50 |
2 | Arsenal | 22 | 44 |
3 | Nottm F | 22 | 44 |
4 | Manchester C | 22 | 38 |
5 | Newcastle | 22 | 38 |
6 | Chelsea | 21 | 37 |
7 | Bournemouth | 22 | 37 |
8 | Aston Villa | 22 | 36 |
9 | Brighton | 22 | 34 |
10 | Fulham | 22 | 33 |
11 | Brentford | 22 | 28 |
12 | Palace | 22 | 27 |
13 | Manchester U | 22 | 26 |
14 | West Ham | 22 | 26 |
15 | Tottenham | 22 | 24 |
16 | Everton | 21 | 20 |
17 | Wolves | 21 | 16 |
18 | Ipswich | 22 | 16 |
19 | Leicester | 22 | 14 |
20 | Southampton | 22 | 6 |