bocadillo
Water Gypsy
Not for much longer if the government has its way.
The government?
Not for much longer if the government has its way.
Have Sky got any more games than they had last season? I thought it was the same number.
I think it's a pity that Sky only make their packages attractive to people who will watch any football. They do nothing for the fan who only wants to see his/her own team. Do they not realise that a huge number of fans do not give a **** about watching the top six if their team is not one of them
Yeah, and why shouldn't you be able to get an iPhone into the UK without paying any taxes? I'm not an advocate of nationalisation by any realms, but if what you say happened, then the Beeb wouldn't be able to advertise in other countries, which I assume (oo er) subsidises the UK's use.I pay for an American site that has a legitimate access, to the Premier League via major American TV Companies. They in turn stream it ( live), I am paying for the service, ( pennies in comparison to Sky etc) , why should that be illegal?
I pay for an American site that has a legitimate access, to the Premier League via major American TV Companies. They in turn stream it ( live), I am paying for the service, ( pennies in comparison to Sky etc) , why should that be illegal?
The government?
I read recently that there are plans to get UK ISPs to block illegal streams of Premier League matches.
Have Sky got any more games than they had last season? I thought it was the same number.
I think it's a pity that Sky only make their packages attractive to people who will watch any football. They do nothing for the fan who only wants to see his/her own team. Do they not realise that a huge number of fans do not give a **** about watching the top six if their team is not one of them
Have Sky got any more games than they had last season? I thought it was the same number.
I think it's a pity that Sky only make their packages attractive to people who will watch any football. They do nothing for the fan who only wants to see his/her own team. Do they not realise that a huge number of fans do not give a **** about watching the top six if their team is not one of them
Why can't people in the UK get "season passes" to their team? I get to watch more football than fans in England. It's madness.
I'm not sure it is the Government that is doing this. The Premier League are taking action through the courts and are 'encouraging' the police to take action against parties who are breaking the law.
That's right and still applies. It's the same for Sunday and midweek games; only one game can be broadcasted live at the time.As Blaarev can testify, a couple of seasons back Premier League introduced new rules that allow Scandinavian broadcasters to show one game maximum at 3PM. Never really understood the rationale behind that one.
Because matches at 3PM on Saturdays can't be broadcast in case it affects the attendances at lower league clubs.
The solution, of course, would be to play no Premier League games at 3PM on Saturday, so they could all be on TV/streamed. If most games are moved to Sunday though, that would cause other problems for people like me who rely on public transport, with the train service being so crap on Sundays.
The High Court has issued a blocking order that will require ISPs to block servers that stream PL matches.
Well all the Football League teams can still breathe easy as they're not going to lose the massive gates they enjoy from the travelling Sandanavian fans.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |