Blaarev
Well-Known Member
I guess that’s a typo for hovering. Maybe that doesn’t make sense, but it makes more sense than covering.Nah. That's not a red. Covering defender.
I guess that’s a typo for hovering. Maybe that doesn’t make sense, but it makes more sense than covering.Nah. That's not a red. Covering defender.
And that isn't one, in my opinion. I wouldn't have given it, but then I have zero training as a referee so I wouldn't have been asked to.You must tell us some time what the laws say about "covering defenders". All that is required for a red card is for there to have been a denial of a goal-scoring opportunity.
Possibly. He looks pretty near from that angle though.You need to see a side view.
How so?Ridiculous. Changed the entire game.
You need to see a side view.
How so?
How does the game change if their captain and centre half gets sent off two minutes into it?
F'real?
< mutters to self wondering why he took the bait.
It didn’t change the game though did it? They had 11 men on the field before, and 11 men on the field after.How does the game change if their captain and centre half gets sent off two minutes into it?
F'real?
< mutters to self wondering why he took the bait.
Yes, Manchester could have gone on to score 4 just like ten man Bournemouth todayIt didn’t change the game though did it? They had 11 men on the field before, and 11 men on the field after.
It could have changed the entire game, yes.
Early red cards do (or can). An absence of a red card doesn’t.Early red cards (or absence thereof) don't alter the courses of games.
Got it. Thanks lads.
Early red cards do (or can). An absence of a red card doesn’t.
Comprendez?
What?
This is pretty much bang on the moneySpot on.
Bewildering decision to play Albrighton as a 'number 10'. Also, the mad idea of playing Iborra in an advanced role leaving Ndidi to mark both De Bruyne and Silva. If I was in the changing room before the game being instructed to do that load of bollocks, I'd have feigned an injury to get the feck out of there.
If ever there was an example of showing a side too much respect, this was it. Everything we're strong at, we didn't do. Feeble from Puel.
That said, the ref was also a total wanker and bottled it big time. It was a clear red for me. However, once Kompany was on a yellow and then Stones off injured, what did we do to exploit them? Absolutely nothing.
I was most concerned watching our players faces when they scored the first goal. Their heads just dropped and they seemed to immediately accept that it was game over. Shocking attitude which has seeped into us a lot over recent months.
For Man City, I thought their keeper was excellent (were you watching how to distribute the ball Kasper?). If you allow De Bruyne and Silva all the space in the world they'll look superb and both did. Their front three I thought were awful. Simpson's positioning in the first half was atrocious but Sane was lazy and wasteful over and again.
Another point on Puel, he seemed happy to only lose 2-0. He wasn't trying to influence the match at all. His substitutions and positional changes were mind numbingly stupid. Still, early days I suppose.
I'm fecked off with that. I don't know if I'll bother going to the Spurs game as it will be exactly the same. We'll just watch them beat us.
Applauding Esteban at half time was the highlight of my afternoon. Utterly, utterly bored with the rest.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |