M17TT C
Well-Known Member
Exactly mate.....We were competitors be and nothing really written no with the performance overall.
Villa just had more quality, guile and rhythm craft than us.
Pleased with the performance.
Exactly mate.....We were competitors be and nothing really written no with the performance overall.
Villa just had more quality, guile and rhythm craft than us.
Pleased with the performance.
Okay let’s try the first sentence again:We were competitors be and nothing really written no with the performance overall.
Villa just had more quality, guile and rhythm craft than us.
Pleased with the performance.
It was tongue in cheek, as that was the accusation last season.You reckon? That would be a bit weird.
Okoli was our best player!I think most players played well, but I wasn't convinced by Okoli. He was too slow and missed too many tackles, I suspect Vesty would have done better if SC wanted a physical presence.
Who the feck is Bruno?Some very dubious refereeing decisions. We’ve a right to be upset, I think with the refs general performance.
As for us?
Cooper put out a team to be hard to beat. It doesn’t work. He needs to put our best players on the pitch. Mavididi made a huge difference, as did Bruno.
Okoli i really like the look of. He will, however, get sent off a few times in his career.
I think you have to pick two of Winks, Wilf and Skipp to pair with Bounanatte.
There will be a lot of “pat on the head, good effort from plucky Leicester” this season, I fear.
I like Fatawu, I think we probably all do, but he’s not helping us at the minute. That’s not to say that he can’t, but it’s all a bit much for him currently. He is constantly caught out defensively, just watch their second goal, as he doesn’t have a clue where Digne is. He was completely taken out of the game by a basic give and go. I thought Justin did well in general today, as he’s really having to work hard at the minute.
As others have said, Mavididi looked good today, we’d probably be better set with him on the left, with a more defensive minded player like VK in behind him and putting Ayew on the right.
If we'd have started with Mavididi and Buonanotte, we'd have been in a much better position to make a game of it in the first half.
Dunno. Typo I reckon.Who the feck is Bruno?
Maybe, I just feel like our balance was better when we did shift it. As I said, it actually makes more sense that way anyway, as Kristiansen is a naturally more defensive player, so the shape seemed to be better when we did switch it.He doesn’t benefit from ‘ze new system’ - The approach is for Kristiansen to push up on the left, and the left sided forward to then come inside. This means that Justin effectively stays back to be the third defender of three - so Fatawu operates completely unsupported, apart from by Ndidi who cannot do that job properly. It’s gonna take some getting used to.
When Mavidid came onto the pitch we did the opposite - with Justin pushing forward and Kristiansen staying back. Unfortunately Fatawu was off by then
I think he will benefit massively from having Buonanotte (or someone better than Ndidi) playing on his inside
Given the way Villa started the game with the space Bailey and Watkins found, I suspect that had we started with more attacking players, we would have been out of the match by half time.
Berner?Who the feck is Bruno?
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |