Leicester and PSR for 23/24

Log in to stop seeing adverts
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase

Panel of people who know **** all somehow manage to string out 30 mins of "content" - amazing, good work and all whilst being paid handsomly.
 
I read somewhere that as PSR is a 3 year rolling calc and that 3rd year (would that be T2 or T3??) drops off with each new cycle, we will have a little bit more room to spend in next year since our T2 was high spend. Got to get there tho and so we have to be careful. I do honestly believe we are trying to play the game.
 
I read somewhere that as PSR is a 3 year rolling calc and that 3rd year (would that be T2 or T3??) drops off with each new cycle, we will have a little bit more room to spend in next year since our T2 was high spend. Got to get there tho and so we have to be careful. I do honestly believe we are trying to play the game.
Oh yes we definitely are. We’ve had a long way to fall and we haven’t taken the piss. We have legitimately scraped the barrel and sold good player to try to comply. It does make me cross though when we spend 25m on someone not up to scratch. That said I think skip is a 5 year contract so for accounting purposes the transfer fee is 5m per year over the next 5 years which isn’t horrendous. It does mean though that if we wanted to sell quickly we’d have to get close to what we paid to avoid a loss on the books. No one would pay 25m for him.
 
The BBC also reported this: "In a joint statement on Tuesday, Leicester and the Premier League said the matter remains "the subject of confidential arbitration proceedings".
That they (the premier league) have almost zero chance of successfully appealing.
 
The BBC also reported this: "In a joint statement on Tuesday, Leicester and the Premier League said the matter remains "the subject of confidential arbitration proceedings".
Yes I saw that, I guess I was looking at the difference between saying we weren’t charged because there is still a process being carried out and saying that “all clubs were deemed financially compliant”, which implies that the arbitration proceedings have no bearing on our passing this, as opposed to it being consequential.
 
**** me. Right, I’ve just watched that, in the interest of seeing what was said. What’s the point on having an “expert” on there, if Jordan is just going to interrupt him all the time, only to be told continuously that he’s wrong?

Talksport presenters are just there to read out the latest odds from various bookies and talk shit for twitter engagement for the 5 seconds an hour that arent adverts. It wasn't great in it's good old days.....it's just unbearable shite now.
 
One feels that the EPL had a meeting that went a bit like this:

EPL Goon 1: "****! We can't go for Leicester because of that damn clever jurisdication loophole thing that we missed out in our own governance rules"

EPL Goon 2: "Well we could, but we'd lose again, and I think our faces are covered in enough egg to feed a small island nation state for several years"

EPL Goon 3: "Alright, well let's leave them, them. Let's just penalise Everton, Man U, Chelsea and Newcastle, then"

EPL Goon 1: "Probably best not to, imagine how much uproar there would be that we docked them points but not Leicester"

EPL Goon 2: "Oooooh those sneaky little foxes have done it again!"

EPL Goon 3: "We'd better keep this quiet fellow goons, I think I saw Wolf from Infinity Rocket Plastics knocking about earlier so we could be being listened too"

EPL Goon 1, 2 and 3 (whispering): "Who's turn is it to be the biscuit?"
 
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool2047
2Nottm F2141
3Arsenal2040
4Chelsea2137
5Newcastle2035
6Manchester C  2135
7Bournemouth2134
8Aston Villa2032
9Fulham2130
10Brentford2128
11Brighton2028
12West Ham2126
13Tottenham 2024
14Manchester U2023
15Palace2021
16Everton1917
17Wolves2016
18Ipswich2016
19Leicester2014
20Southampton206
Back
Top