Leicester face questions about FFP

Log in to stop seeing adverts

The attitude of the club just stinks doesn't it? Bang goes any leniency for compliance and if they throw the book at us then all anger needs to be directed at the owners & board. The last few years was never all Rodgers, him being such an easy to dislike **** kept most of the eyes off the bellends at the top.
 
From the best run club in the land to one of the worst. The owners kertowed to Brendan's bitching, showed some ambition but backed the wrong horse......
 
The Premier League is going to be a mess next season. We'll be starting on negative points (should we go up) and if rumours are to be believed, Chelsea and Forest are about to fail FFP for this season.

They'll probably be others that we're not yet aware of too. Could easily be 4-5 teams starting on negative points.
We aren’t going to be in the premier league next season. I’m sorry to say that we have ****ed it again. The momentum is going one way.
 
And we are ****ing up promotion.

It’s death by a thousand ****ing cuts with this club.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What a statement that is.

You clearly don't have any concept of what your role should be. You are supposed to represent supporters and the clubs best interest, not the current custodians.

Prawn sandwiches over fans every time isn't it?
I have read it several times. Where does it say in this article/statement that the FT doesn’t support or represent the supporters and the clubs best interests? Alternatively, where does it say that they represent the best interests of KP?

In terms of direct interaction with the club, and what the FT is currently seeking from the club, these appear to be the relevant passages:-

“we have robustly challenged the Club to explain the current situation to the Trust.

We will be meeting with the Club during next week to discuss the 22/23 accounts just prior to their publication and will again raise questions about the financial consequences of relegation from the EPL, compliance with Profit & Sustainability Rules (PSR) and the likely impact across the 23/24 and 24/25 seasons”.


I have in the past been critical of the trust, but let’s not allow our automatic reaction to anything they post (or do) be completely negative for the sake of it.

 
I have read it several times. Where does it say in this article/statement that the FT doesn’t support or represent the supporters and the clubs best interests? Alternatively, where does it say that they represent the best interests of KP?

Congratulations for being able to read the statement several times. That took a lot of endurance considering its banality.

My problem is in what wasn't said rather than what was. I've defended the FT on here before and recognise that there needs to be an organisation that can speak up when required. The problem is that the FT don't speak up when they should. And when they do make a statement, it is one littered with nothingness except a desperation to stay onside with King Power.

If ever there was a time when the FT needed to be relevant, it was now. They've failed because they're scared and/or in the pocket of the clowns. Which is why I don't think that they're representing supporters or the best interests of the club.
 
Log in to stop seeing adverts

P Pld Pts
1Liverpool1128
2Manchester C  1123
3Chelsea1119
4Arsenal1119
5Nottm F1119
6Brighton1119
7Fulham1118
8Newcastle1118
9Aston Villa1118
10Tottenham 1116
11Brentford1116
12Bournemouth1115
13Manchester U1115
14West Ham1112
15Leicester1110
16Everton1110
17Ipswich118
18Palace117
19Wolves116
20Southampton114

Latest posts

Back
Top