Agree, however I’m not surprised it’s Albrighton in so we can swap between 4 and 5 at the back.I think Under is unlucky. Again.
Ünderrated?I think Under is unlucky. Again.
I heard that too but according to an article in The Athletic, that’s not the case.Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't there something in Unders loan deal that city have to sign him if he plays so many games for us? Maybe that's the reason he's not starting?
Correct me if I'm wrong but isn't there something in Unders loan deal that city have to sign him if he plays so many games for us? Maybe that's the reason he's not starting?
Rob Tanner clearly stated that isn't the case the other day. There is nothing in the loan agreement which could get in the way of choosing whether to play him.
I don't think BR trusts him without the ball.
Mustn’t have taken longRobert Huth on my stream, talking about Leeds defence qualities
He said they don’t know how to defendMustn’t have taken long
Can't complain with that lineup.
I did wonder if we might see Ünder or even Ricardo in for Albrighton, but MA has been on good form so can understand him keeping his place.
Under can make a big impact as a sub here hopefully.
Just hope we can take our chances today. Barnes could be key.
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |