ThaiSweetChilli
Well-Known Member
damn, i was just saying this
scoop
damn, i was just saying this
Tuff time thinking up a song
They pronounce it as a "sshhhh" - they don't have the "j" sound.
You mean Pasquineshai?Stringy is no doubt going to ask the question.
My mrs is Argentinian. She's delighted - after the failure of Fernando Pasquinelli she's hoping Oosh will be better.
In the early 1960s Worcester City bought a player called Eddie Bailham. Notice the word "bought" It was not only a record transfer fee for the club of £2,000 it was the only transfer fee the club had ever paid. Eddie Bailham turned out to be a very good non-league player and arguably the best player in the Worcester team. You might think he would be popular with the fans; he was not. For £2,000 the Worcester fans thought he should play like Bobby Charlton. Every chance that was not taken, every shot that was saved, every header that was not won was greeted by complaints of "Waste of money."
This circuitous link between Mr Ulloa and Eddie Bailham will be enjoyed by brighter members of the forum. However, for others let me explain. We have paid a club record fee. This has not got us a member of the Argentinian world cup squad or a proven Premier League goal scorer.. For £8 million plus we should not expect the new Frank Worthington or Gary Lineker.
It may be that Ulloa will be a bargain in the way that Vardy and Mahrez have been. If he turns out to be brilliant then great. However, at modern prices he will be worth £8 million if he starts most games gets ten goals and is in a team that does not get relegated.
Very good post.In the early 1960s Worcester City bought a player called Eddie Bailham. Notice the word "bought" It was not only a record transfer fee for the club of £2,000 it was the only transfer fee the club had ever paid. Eddie Bailham turned out to be a very good non-league player and arguably the best player in the Worcester team. You might think he would be popular with the fans; he was not. For £2,000 the Worcester fans thought he should play like Bobby Charlton. Every chance that was not taken, every shot that was saved, every header that was not won was greeted by complaints of "Waste of money."
This circuitous link between Mr Ulloa and Eddie Bailham will be enjoyed by brighter members of the forum. However, for others let me explain. We have paid a club record fee. This has not got us a member of the Argentinian world cup squad or a proven Premier League goal scorer.. For £8 million plus we should not expect the new Frank Worthington or Gary Lineker.
It may be that Ulloa will be a bargain in the way that Vardy and Mahrez have been. If he turns out to be brilliant then great. However, at modern prices he will be worth £8 million if he starts most games gets ten goals and is in a team that does not get relegated.
Why such a negative response DG, you don't know how good or bad he will be in the Premier League. Clearly the club have done their homework on this guy, considering they tried and failed to get him in the January transfer window, now they have got him, they clearly think he's worth the money that the club have paid for his services. So instead of trying to compare him and the monies paid, for some unknown player in a year many on this forum think is the 'dark ages' lets welcome the guy, who knows he may be the bargain of the decade.
Big one too.Whoosh
In the early 1960s Worcester City bought a player called Eddie Bailham. Notice the word "bought" It was not only a record transfer fee for the club of £2,000 it was the only transfer fee the club had ever paid. Eddie Bailham turned out to be a very good non-league player and arguably the best player in the Worcester team. You might think he would be popular with the fans; he was not. For £2,000 the Worcester fans thought he should play like Bobby Charlton. Every chance that was not taken, every shot that was saved, every header that was not won was greeted by complaints of "Waste of money."
This circuitous link between Mr Ulloa and Eddie Bailham will be enjoyed by brighter members of the forum. However, for others let me explain. We have paid a club record fee. This has not got us a member of the Argentinian world cup squad or a proven Premier League goal scorer.. For £8 million plus we should not expect the new Frank Worthington or Gary Lineker.
It may be that Ulloa will be a bargain in the way that Vardy and Mahrez have been. If he turns out to be brilliant then great. However, at modern prices he will be worth £8 million if he starts most games gets ten goals and is in a team that does not get relegated.
Why such a negative response DG, you don't know how good or bad he will be in the Premier League. Clearly the club have done their homework on this guy, considering they tried and failed to get him in the January transfer window, now they have got him, they clearly think he's worth the money that the club have paid for his services. So instead of trying to compare him and the monies paid, for some unknown player in a year many on this forum think is the 'dark ages' lets welcome the guy, who knows he may be the bargain of the decade.
Excellent post by DG that sums up my thoughts. We know that Ulloa is a forward who brings others into play rather than a pure goalscorer, so 10 in addition to his team work would indeed be a fine return.
Two points I can't recall anyone mentioning; unlike most of those ahead of him in last season's scoring charts, he doesn't take penalties; he seems to score important goals (didn't he get Brighton into the playoffs?).
There is also a good reason he doesn't take penalties for them:
Worst Premier League signing of the week: Ulloa to Leicester
He scored for fun at BHA but £8m is too much for player with limited top-flight experience
The real buzz of the transfer window is yet to begin so picking a worst signing of the week was not easy but it had to be done - so step forward Leonardo Ulloa.
The 27-year-old striker has swapped the Amex Stadium for the King Power after leaving Brighton for Leicester in an £8m switch.
Having scored 23 goals in 50 games for the Seagulls Ulloa is expected to go well in the Premier League but his lack of top-flight experience could see him found out.
Sunderland boss Gus Poyet, who managed Ulloa at Brighton, was full of praise for the uncapped Argentine but despite some mild interest neglected to take his former charge with him to the Stadium of Light.
This should have set alarm bells ringing for Nigel Pearson who will be under pressure to help the striker deliver after shelling out such a large sum.
The Foxes gaffer should instead have dipped into the free transfer market, where the likes of Mame Biram Diouf and Bafetimbi Gomis were chomping at the bit to play in the Premier League.
Diouf, thought of as a Manchester United flop on these shores, was a revelation during his time in the Bundesliga, smashing 35 goals in his 71 games for Hannover, while Gomis’ 91 goals for Lyon demonstrate his ability to play in a top league.
Both men have ended up at unfashionable clubs, with Diouf joining Stoke and Gomis opting for Swansea, and Pearson should look at these moves with regret for not throwing his hat into the ring.
Both players are probably commanding higher wages than Ulloa but the £8m saved on a transfer fee would more than have covered this.
Ignoring the free market, however, there are probably a number of players better equipped to handle the Premier League available for similar fees as Ulloa.
Shakthar Donetsk’s Luiz Adrian, for one, is nearing the end of his contract and having scored 23 goals in 37 games last season is in top form.
His Champions League experience means he would be unlikely to be fazed by England’s top flight and the 27-year-old Brazilian could have been a better option.
Likewise, Napoli’s Goran Pandev who has also run out for Lazio and Inter Milan in Serie A. Almost 100 goals in Italy’s top flight are not to be sniffed at and while older he could have also represented better value than Pearson’s new charge.
This may be Football Manager-type thinking but with Leicester just 21/10 for the drop, unless Ulloa lives up to hype it could be Pearson who get the dreaded ‘e-mail from chairman’ in his inbox
P | Pld | Pts | |
1 | Liverpool | 11 | 28 |
2 | Manchester C | 11 | 23 |
3 | Chelsea | 11 | 19 |
4 | Arsenal | 11 | 19 |
5 | Nottm F | 11 | 19 |
6 | Brighton | 11 | 19 |
7 | Fulham | 11 | 18 |
8 | Newcastle | 11 | 18 |
9 | Aston Villa | 11 | 18 |
10 | Tottenham | 11 | 16 |
11 | Brentford | 11 | 16 |
12 | Bournemouth | 11 | 15 |
13 | Manchester U | 11 | 15 |
14 | West Ham | 11 | 12 |
15 | Leicester | 11 | 10 |
16 | Everton | 11 | 10 |
17 | Ipswich | 11 | 8 |
18 | Palace | 11 | 7 |
19 | Wolves | 11 | 6 |
20 | Southampton | 11 | 4 |