Leyton Orient Player Ratings

[FantasyFox]

I HAD..........

But during moments of total tedium when i need to move out of the real world into the fantasy and unstable headspaces of the majority of cretins who persist in posting inate and infantile rubbish on here I have a read for amusement purposes.

Loser. Have you not found Dr. Bizzaro? Amuse yourself elsewhere, we've had enough of your time wasting. This is a serious site for serious people. Now lets get back to specifying a suitable system for judging the performance of some serious footballing talent.

I think a Tunchev 6 is better than a King 7. But a Joey 5 would trump the lot.

 

[David Gwilliam]

It's an interesting topic tho' BF.

For me, if a player has an Ok game, nothing great, nothing poor, then I would give them a 6 (so that is my "average" or start point I suppose.

To me:
10 - would need to totally dominate a Premiership side, so unlikely to award this (and never have)
9 - would be excellent, or sometimes used if several players get 8 & I feel one was above the others
8 - Very Good game
7 - Steady performance, with some good play that I recall
6 - Average game
5 - Means below par
4 - Poor game
3 - Poor game and the players direct actions cost us points
2 - Put absolutely no effort into the game at all & made loads of mistakes
1 - Never want the player to wear the shirt again

Never given a 1 or 2 on here, Nathan Blake would have been given a 1 for one of his home performances had we been doing the scores at the time.

So how do others do the 10 to 1 countdown

I think it was against Bolton some years ago we should have won 2-0. However, Spider Kalac, the worst Leicester player I ever saw, made three stupid errors and we lost 2-3. Nothing in Nathan Blakes ignominious career reached the depths of Spider on that day. If there had been a minus mark he would have deserved it.