Looking a little bare!
- Thread starter Tom W
- Start date
This page may contain links to companies such as eBay and Amazon. As an affiliate of these sites I may earn commission if you click the link and make a purchase
- Status
Babylon
Active Member
The last time we were in div one our wage bill was 16.5million, when we went up micky was given 4mil to add to that in wages or fees. Bringing the total to just over 20mil.
Paul mace said this years budget was half of last years , which makes it a 10mil budget (he actually mentioned 10mil). Which is why we have shed so many players as Micky had to get over 10mil off the books.
The 10mil budget includes fees and wages of new players he wants to buy and old players wages already on the books. If you think he has 4 mil to spend that means the wages of players we have at the moment don't total over 6 / 6.5mil.
Although Walker and Elliot combined must take up about 2.5 / 3mil!!
Paul mace said this years budget was half of last years , which makes it a 10mil budget (he actually mentioned 10mil). Which is why we have shed so many players as Micky had to get over 10mil off the books.
The 10mil budget includes fees and wages of new players he wants to buy and old players wages already on the books. If you think he has 4 mil to spend that means the wages of players we have at the moment don't total over 6 / 6.5mil.
Although Walker and Elliot combined must take up about 2.5 / 3mil!!
fairbanksh
New Member
delusion order of the day
MA showed last season that the strategy was wrong, the tactics were frequentlywrong and the player he trailed the most pre season was Nalis-enough said
He is already complaining about the budget!
He really aint that good
MA showed last season that the strategy was wrong, the tactics were frequentlywrong and the player he trailed the most pre season was Nalis-enough said
He is already complaining about the budget!
He really aint that good
scary jester
New Member
According to a report i read we can expect a "host" of new faces.
Cobbo
New Member
alex said:
I'll have a go too, Matty Elliott could never run and he did ok.
but seriously, Cullip would be a good signing I think. I've been on the Brighton OS forum asking about him and they all seem to rate him highly and clearly won't want him to go...they seem to think that they'll want £1 mill for him at least too....but what do fans know ay
I think with Dabizas and Thatcher probably going, getting rid of Elliott would be a mistake, as we'd only have Matty Heath that can play centre half (excluding any possible signings)! we'll need at least 3 centre halfs I expect, Stearman is probably still a bit young.
Southern Fox
New Member
I think Thatcher and Dabizas will both leave. I would be upset about Thatch but the lad can play at a higher level.
So we need defensive cover. I rate Cullip but once again I thought we had a better chance of getting him last season when Brighton went down and we went up. I dont think we will get him now!
So we need defensive cover. I rate Cullip but once again I thought we had a better chance of getting him last season when Brighton went down and we went up. I dont think we will get him now!
- Status
| P | Pld | Pts | |
| 1 | Liverpool | 15 | 36 |
| 2 | Chelsea | 16 | 34 |
| 3 | Arsenal | 17 | 33 |
| 4 | Nottm F | 17 | 31 |
| 5 | Aston Villa | 17 | 28 |
| 6 | Manchester C | 17 | 27 |
| 7 | Newcastle | 17 | 26 |
| 8 | Bournemouth | 16 | 25 |
| 9 | Brighton | 17 | 25 |
| 10 | Fulham | 16 | 24 |
| 11 | Tottenham | 16 | 23 |
| 12 | Brentford | 17 | 23 |
| 13 | Manchester U | 16 | 22 |
| 14 | West Ham | 17 | 20 |
| 15 | Palace | 17 | 16 |
| 16 | Everton | 15 | 15 |
| 17 | Leicester | 16 | 14 |
| 18 | Ipswich | 17 | 12 |
| 19 | Wolves | 16 | 9 |
| 20 | Southampton | 16 | 5 |
